This is scary - RWJF buys students as lab rats
Lab Rats: CU Sells Student Body to Out-of-State Foundation
Article seen at:
http://www.i2i.org/main/article.php?article_id=%20118&cycle=2008-1
On June 6, 1996, the Regents of the University of Colorado submitted a proposal to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJ) for a grant under the Foundation's "A Matter of Degree" program. The University received $870,269 over 5 years in exchange for using its students, the citizens of Boulder, and the people of Colorado as laboratory rats in a social engineering experiment designed to "change campus culture" and the laws governing alcohol consumption.[1]
Based in Princeton, New Jersey, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is one of the nations 10 largest It awarded almost $300,000,000 in grants in 1997.[2]
Rather than help sick, poor, or unfortunate individuals, RWJ buys government policy. It spent millions to pass the Clinton health care plan, and continues to lavish funds on organizations and state governments willing to work to increase government control of health care.[3]
When RWJ decided that substance abuse was a bigger national health problem than cancer, heart disease, stroke, or diabetes, all foundation funding for tobacco control efforts went from $85,000 a year in 1990 to $10.6 million in 1995.[4]
Organizing vocal coalitions around institutions with the power and influence to drown out any opposition is a key part of RWJ strategy. CU promised to assemble a "broad-based" task force with members drawn from Boulder City government, restaurant licensing boards, local businesses, and the media to "develop and implement action plans to move the project forward." It promised to support the lobbying efforts of the increasingly extreme Mothers against Drunk Driving and DARE, the ineffective drug education program. It also promised to lobby for state legislation to change penalties for drinking and driving.
The grant's action plan makes it clear that CU and the Foundation consider Boulder citizens serfs in CU's fief. Though CU does not control the Boulder police, it promised RWJ that it would "maintain increased enforcement by Boulder police in the Hill area which adjoins campus," and budgeted money to pay police salaries. Though CU does not legally represent the citizens of Boulder, it promised to work to "change procedures" at Boulder's major events such as the annual Kinetics race, the Bolder Boulderthe July fireworks event, the Boulder Fall Festival, the Creek Festival, and Chautauqua.[5]
It also planned to clutter Boulder County highways with "remembrance markers," and to "work with bar and restaurant owners to curtailhappy hours." Note the euphemisms. One does not "work with" task forces that include officials who have the power to put one out of business. One does what one is told.
The grant envisions everyone else doing what he is told, as well. CU identified "inconsistencies among rules and sanctions" in force on campus, in the City of Boulder, and in Boulder County as "a problem that contributes to high-risk drinking." It fretted that strict rules on campus would cause students to "move to a more amenable location" rather than stop drinking.[6] Social engineers tend to ignore the fact that it is irresponsible behavior, rather than drinking per se, that is the problem. CU could have chosen to expel or suspend students who violate the law. Instead, it promised to try to extend RWJ's version of prohibition to the larger community.
The database allowing "the various community services involved in enforcement and treatment of alcohol abuse to share casework information" is more sinister.[7] RWJ grant proposals give the Foundation ownership of any data arising from activities under its grants.[8] Will students in "confidential" counseling programs wake up someday and find their lives laid out in full in the RWJ data archive at the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research?
The students surveyed in 1993 as a part of a RWJ study on alcohol use and abuse among American college students already have. Their answers to detailed questions about themselves and their family are for sale in a machine readable database at ICPSR. The database covers drinking behavior, drug use, illegal behavior, attitudes of friends and family, sexual practices, and attitudes towards the university policies along with age, sex, year in college, place of residence, race, height, weight, parents' education, and religion. Given university records, individual identification would be a snap.[9]
All of which raises a few questions. What is high-risk drinking, exactly? What individual data are being collected in the course of this grant and who, specifically, has, or will have, access to it? What else has the University promised RWJ in its grant reports? Did the University obtain clearance from the University of Colorado at Boulder Human Research Committee before it started experimenting on the entire student body?
Finally, is it proper that an institution supported by state tax funds sells its services to an out-of-state foundation in exchange for using its influence and facilities to help impose an alien set of policies on Colorado citizens?
