Consumer Reports suspends recommendations on eight Toyota models
Jan 29, 2010
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2010/01/consumer-re...
Consumer Reports has temporarily suspended its "recommended" status for eight Toyota vehicle models and one Pontiac model that may have accelerator pedals that can stick and cause unintended acceleration.
A new Toyota truck sits on the sales lot at Superior Toyota of Oakland February 25, 2009 in Oakland, California. The world's largest automaker announced in November that it would replace the accelerator pedal in 3.8 million recalled vehicles after five deaths and two hundred incidents of unintended acceleration were documented. Now it has announced another recall.
Consumer Reports is also telling used-car buyers to avoid purchasing any of the affected vehicles until this issue is resolved. As far as new cars go, this shouldn't be a problem since Toyota dealers stopped selling them Tuesday and Pontiac went out of business.
"Although incidents of sudden acceleration are rare, we are taking this action because the vehicles have been identified as potentially unsafe without a fix yet being available to consumers" said Jim Guest, president of Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports.
Interesting move, considering earlier this week, CR's auto engineer Jake Fisher was downplaying safety risks this week. "These cars aren't dangerous," he said.
But CR, like the rental car agencies that have pulled them from their fleets, went ahead anyway. This is another tough break for Toyota. The brand has been a Consumer Reports' darling for decades and many rely on the magazine -- it is run by a non-profit, doesn't take advertising and buys all its test cars from dealers -- when choosing their next car. Automakers covet CR's recommdendations.
The affected models include:
2005-2010 Avalon
2007-2010 Camry (excluding the Hybrid and some other models)
2009-2010 Corolla
2010 Highlander (excluding the Hybrid model)
2009-2010 Matrix
2009-2010 RAV4
2007-2010 Tundra
2008-2010 Sequoia
2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe





Doubt cast on Toyota's decision to blame sudden acceleration on gas pedal defect
http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fi-toyota-pedal30-2010jan30,0,4708338,ful...
The pedal maker denies that its products are at fault. Some independent safety experts also are skeptical of Toyota's explanations. 'We know this recall is a red herring,' one says.
Toyota Motor Corp.'s decision to blame its widening sudden-acceleration problem on a gas pedal defect came under attack Friday, with the pedal manufacturer flatly denying that its products were at fault.
Federal vehicle safety records reviewed by The Times also cast doubt on Toyota's claims that sticky gas pedals were a significant factor in the growing reports of runaway vehicles. Of more than 2,000 motorist complaints of sudden acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles over the last decade, just 5% blamed a sticking gas pedal, the analysis found.
What's more, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has conducted eight investigations into sudden-acceleration problems in Toyota vehicles over the last seven years, none of which identified a sticking pedal as a potential cause.
"The way the sudden-acceleration problems are occurring in reported incidents doesn't comport with how this sticky pedal is described," said Sean Kane, president of Safety Research & Strategies, a Rehoboth, Mass., auto safety consulting firm. "We know this recall is a red herring."
Sudden-acceleration events in Toyota and Lexus vehicles have been blamed for at least 19 fatalities and 815 vehicle crashes since 1999. (MORE)
~The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism~
Sir William Osler
For Toyota drivers, confusion and growing anger
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR201001...
Toyota executives have been virtually silent amid a recall of millions of their cars because gas pedals can become dangerously stuck. For their customers, oh, what a feeling - fear, frustration, confusion and anger.
Since Tuesday, when the Japanese automaker said it would stop making and selling some of its top-selling models, the company has had few answers for dealers and drivers - most notably about when Toyota owners could get their cars fixed and hit the road without worrying.
"I'm stuck with this car," said Tony Raasch of Hales Corners, Wis., who said he hit another driver in his 2010 Corolla two weeks ago when the car suddenly accelerated. "I really don't know what to do. I just feel - I guess - ripped off is the best way to put it." (MORE)
~The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism~
Sir William Osler
Jan 19, 2010 -- Chrysler Group LLC will recall 24,177 vehicles due to a potential defect in a brake system that could result in sudden brake failure, the automaker said in a filing with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The recall applies to 2010 model-year Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Avenger and Nitro, and Jeep Liberty, Commander and Grand Cherokee SUVs, as well as 2009-2010 model year Dodge Ram trucks.
In some of the vehicles, the clip retention tab on the brake pedal pin was improperly formed, or not installed, during the manufacturing process, Chrysler said. That could result in brake failure without warning and could cause a crash, the company said. Chrysler said it was unaware of any accidents or injuries related to the issue. Chrysler said the safety recall is expected to begin during the month of January.
http://www.lemonauto.com/complaints/daimler_chrysler/jeep_liberty.htm
If ''CON' is the opposite of 'PRO', does that mean Congress is the opposite of Progress?
Owners look for answers in Toyota recall
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota30-2010jan30,0,5882035.story
Quote from article:
"Such problems have been blamed in at least 19 deaths and numerous injuries over the last decade, prompting Toyota to launch two recalls in the U.S.
The reverberations continued Friday as Toyota announced that a European recall could include up to 1.8 million cars, pushing the global total to 9 million, or nearly as many vehicles as were sold in the U.S. last year."
~The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism~
Sir William Osler
U.S. Surgeon General office has issued a health warning. It’s come to the attention of this office that we Americans are at great risk. We’ve all been warned of driver distraction through usage of our cell phones and texting devices while driving. A new threat has emerged. It has come to our attention that out-of-control Toyotas have clogged our highways with danger to everyone and anyone who drives. Speeding unsafe Toyotas have resulted in multiple deaths worldwide and as Americans we need to exercise extra caution when driving with these foreign invaders. Many have speculated why this could happen to foolish Americans that buy the job killing brands. As Americans we understand that Toyota has lost considerable brand value but this affects all of us as we drive with the unsafe vehicles. What to do? Demand that the afflicted vehicles be taken off the road, they pose a serious threat to loyal Americans who are constantly threatened with inferior products from abroad. Tell your representative that Japan needs to institute a Cash for Toyota Clunkers that will vanquish the killers off our roads and get back some of Americans money that was given to Japan for our own misguided Cash of Clunkers program.;-)
WORDS OF WISDOM
Insurance companies could soon be raising rate or possibly refuse to insure the Toyota brand. So those of you that are shopping for a Toyota check with your insurance agent before you buy. BUY AMERICAN!
~The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism~
Sir William Osler
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9DF2BCG0.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/business/global/28auto.html
"Chrysler, whose alliance with Fiat was a condition for it to receive billions in loans from the federal government, is expected to discontinue some of its worst-selling models in favor of the more stylish and advanced Fiat and Alfa Romeo products.
Among the vehicles destined for North America, the company officials said, are the tiny Fiat 500, an Alfa Romeo sport utility vehicle and a sedan based on Alfa Romeo technology to replace the midsize Chrysler Sebring."
If ''CON' is the opposite of 'PRO', does that mean Congress is the opposite of Progress?
Jeep Liberty Recall Because of Steering Defect
Chrysler announced that it is recalling over 800,000 Jeep Liberty sport utility vehicles because of the potential loss of steering control after Chrysler received 111 complaints about this problem. The National Highway Safety Administration has so far received nearly 500 complaints regarding this problem with the Jeep Liberty. Chrysler admits three reports of injuries from auto accidents as a result of the defect. In the complaints that have been made, the ball joint failed, dropping the vehicle's front end onto one or both of the front tires.
Many personal injury lawyers in Maryland and around the country have been talking about this recall because it impacts so many vehicles. These lawyers are gearing up for claims that the steering ball joint in the Jeep Liberty has caused auto accidents that could have been prevented. I suspect, however, that the number of car accidents from this recall will be very low. But in rare cases where a serious car accident is caused by this defect, I am sure that Chrysler will seek to resolve those accident cases with the plaintiffs' attorneys very quickly.
http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2006/08/jeep_liberty_recall_because_of.html
If ''CON' is the opposite of 'PRO', does that mean Congress is the opposite of Progress?
November 10, 2003
Chrysler is recalling about 438,000 Jeep Liberty SUVs because of problems in the front suspension. The company says it received 47 complaints about the problem. Some consumers said they lost control of the vehicle and crashed. Others said a wheel fell off.
Chrysler says the problem stems from the lower ball joint seal, which can become damaged and lead to a loss of control.
The incidents reported so far did not result in any injuries, the company said.
As part of the worldwide recall, all of the vehicles will be fitted with a heat shield. About 318,000 will receive new ball joints, and 120,000 vehicles will be inspected.
The recall includes Jeep Libertys from the 2002 model year, as well as 2003 models built before the end of March this year.
In addition, Chrysler is recalling 10,000 of its new Chrysler Pacifica wagons to install a secondary clip to the fuel line to keep it secure.
Read more: http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news03/jeep_recall.html#ixzz0e7EYyGEv
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news03/jeep_recall.html
If ''CON' is the opposite of 'PRO', does that mean Congress is the opposite of Progress?
Only ONE model, ONE nameplate, ONE manufacturer, ONE factory. Shall we count the MILLIONS of recalls on other Crysler products? That will take some time since this 1,661,971 recalls is ONLY for the Jeep Liberty made by Chrysler and built in TOLEDO OHIO. There may be other plants that make the Jeep Liberty, but I do not know of them.
http://www.lemonauto.com/complaints/daimler_chrysler/jeep_liberty.htm
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had opened defect investigations involving the Durango and Liberty.
In the Liberty recall, Gates said the blower motors could fail if the air conditioning is being used on high during hot weather.
Drivers who smell an odor such as overheated plastic should keep their blower motor below the highest setting until they bring their vehicle in for service, Chrysler said. Liberty owners are expected to receive notices about the recall in May.
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
www.nhtsa.dot.gov
If ''CON' is the opposite of 'PRO', does that mean Congress is the opposite of Progress?
I'd bet you dollars to donuts most if not all of the recalls can be traced to management trying to save a few pennies on each vehicle and buying crappy parts.
I've had a bunch of Dodges, Chryslers and Jeeps. About the only real complaint I had was the brakes wear out ridiculously fast. A vehicle that has 20,000 miles shouldn't need to have the front pads and rotors replaced because of rust coming out of the rotors.
That isn't a workmanship problem, that's buying garbage parts.
"We're all riding on the Hindenburg, no sense fighting over the window seats"-Richard Jenni
It appears the influence of the unionists is wanning even in their home.
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/30/turning-cash-to-ash/
Where does Caesar go when Rome is against him?
MikeyA
The Toyota implosion…what it really means.
By Peter M. De Lorenzo
http://www.autoextremist.com/
(Posted 1/30/10, 6:30PM) Detroit. A corporate image for a company directly involved with consumers is a very fragile thing. A savvy company can carefully cultivate and nurture an image over a period of years. It can forge an identity by exploiting its nuances and crafting its effectiveness, and it can even create an aura for itself that may or may not be completely true, but if done expertly enough can convince legions of consumer/believers that you are who you say you are.
Over the past 35-plus years Toyota has burnished one overriding message into consumers’ minds in this country, and that message revolves around the idea that Toyota-built cars and trucks are the highest quality vehicles on the road, and that if consumers adhere to by-the-book maintenance schedules they just do not break. Ever.
And Toyota has enjoyed considerable success in this market by riding that reputation for all it was worth, as more and more consumers bought into the idea that - though bland transportation conveyances for the most part - Toyotas just wouldn’t let you down.
Until the events of last week, that is.
Actually, last week was the culmination of a series of negative events having to do with quality – or the lack of same – that has vexed Toyota for years now. There was the oiling-sludge problem in a brace of their engines. And there was the severe rust problem in Toyota pickup trucks, to the point that the spare tire carriers would simply fall out and on to the road it was so pronounced, just to name a few of the most noteworthy examples.
But Toyota skated through these “hiccups” as they quickly and for the most part quietly addressed consumers’ problems and moved on, escaping the harsh light of a frenzied media too busy holding the domestic manufacturers accountable for myriad transgressions, both real and imagined. For years and years if there was ever a Toyota recall the news of it would quickly come and go, while in comparison, if there was ever a recall from a domestic manufacturer it was the top story on Internet news sites and leading the evening television news for days.
As I wrote about it in The United States of Toyota, there was a blatant bias at work in the media that fueled the notion that Toyota=Good and Detroit=Bad – not that Detroit didn’t contribute to its atrocious quality reputation, because it emphatically did – and Toyota’s heretofore impenetrable and unimpeachable reputation for quality could never be sullied by a few rusted pickups here and there. After all, its cars and trucks – and its reputation – were bullet proof.
That attitude came across in spades when the executives of the Detroit Three ended up in Washington, D.C., begging for financial help at the end of ’08 too. In those disastrous hearings it became crystal clear by the intensity of the bile spewed against the Detroit executives that the “notion” of Toyota=Good, Detroit=Bad wasn’t a notion at all, but a fact that had not only burrowed into the American consumer consciousness, but into the gaping maw of the Washington political establishment as well.
Until the events of last week, that is.
Last week the automotive world as we know it became unequivocally and irrevocably altered when Toyota was forced to admit that not only did they have a severe problem with sticking accelerator pedals – or sudden unintentional acceleration incidents in their vehicles – but that they didn’t really have a grasp of the scope of the issue or just how they were going to fix it, either.
Toyota plants were idled and dealers were ordered to stop selling the vehicles in question immediately as the severity of the problem blew up into the American consumer consciousness. Rental car companies removed Toyotas from their fleets. Automotive auction houses ordered an immediate cessation of all activities involving the affected Toyota models. And the media of all stripes went absolutely crazy.
After all, this just wasn’t another auto company recall - no, it was the end of everything great and wonderfully righteous about a brand that had basically enjoyed a free pass with consumers and the media for years.
Don’t forget that as part of Toyota’s orchestrated image offensive its U.S. marketing and Public Relations arms had purposely gone after something that no import automaker had ever attempted to do – or even thought about doing for that matter – and that was to capture the hearts and minds of the American consumer public and convince them that Toyota was indeed an American company, by any measure.
Toyota absolutely believed that they could become part of the American fabric, and they were hell-bent on doing so.
Toyota sponsored everything from local ball teams to NCAA football, PGA Golf, Major League Baseball and NFL telecasts. As a matter of fact wherever there was a quintessentially American sporting event going on you could bet that Toyota was present and accounted for. But Toyota’s calculated largesse didn’t stop there. The company also promoted high-visibility educational scholarships and charitable initiatives, while its exceedingly slick lobbying efforts laid waste to any sense of objectivity left in the halls of Congress, and particularly in the states in which they built plants.
And its jolly green, Prius-driven, holier-than-thou persona as the Greenest Entity on Earth was just the icing on its proverbially self-righteous cake, as legions of consumers and legislators bought into the fact that that not only was Toyota an American company, it was, in fact, America’s Car Company in every possible way. (Except, of course, when it pertained to where Toyota’s profits went at the end of the day. Ah, those niggling little details.)
But now, with last week’s massive recall and the burgeoning fallout from it, Toyota has become something it had so desperately wanted to avoid over the last 35 years: just another car company.
Don’t believe it? Up until last week Toyota had managed to stay above the fray by operating as if it was in another solar system, one not subject to the vagaries of the business or such sordid, untidy, image-killing episodes as the kinds of recalls that other auto manufacturers had to deal with. Toyota believed – and had managed to convince a great number of others too – that it was immune from such nonsense. That it really was above all the rest.
But last week changed all of that.
In this media-intensive frenzy that we all live in today - fueled by the Internet and exponentially multiplied by the new social media outlets – Toyota’s one-word alter ego – “quality” – was eradicated. I was going to say it became something else, but what has really happened is that there’s now a void, as if the one-word descriptor that used to define Toyota has blown away with the prevailing media-driven firestorm.
This Toyota debacle isn’t just another car company recall, because the “Toyota Way” that used to perfectly encapsulate the mindset behind Toyota’s success has now become “Toyota Has Lost Its Way.” And other than the usual assortment of company apologies and platitudes, the company doesn’t have the first clue as to how it will get its mojo back.
A few years ago, when Toyota management embarked on its now disastrous (and now quaintly ludicrous) quest to become the world’s largest automaker, finally dethroning GM from the top spot, little did anyone know that - consumed by its mission - it would walk away from everything it had stood for up until that point in time.
The slow but ploddingly sure Toyota method of incremental sales increases year-over-year followed by a correspondingly gradual increase in capacity - while accounting for its usual high quality standards - gave way to a frenzy of plant building and a complete abdication of what it once stood for when it came to quality.
The Toyota implosion marks a definitive shift in the American automotive landscape. After dominating the hearts and minds of the American consumer public for the better part of three decades, we are now witnessing the end of Toyota’s reign over this market.
With Toyota unable to avoid the kind of national and now international scrutiny - and notoriety - that has humbled lesser companies, we will see Toyota eventually fall back from the top tier in this market, eclipsed by a host of savvy competitors led by a dramatically rejuvenated Ford and an increasingly aggressive Hyundai.
It took 35 years of intense focus for Toyota to get to the top of the industry in this market and around the world, but in just one week Toyota’s masterfully calculated image and hallowed reputation is now in tatters, decimated by a swirling maelstrom of its own hubris and unbridled greed.
It has been a devastatingly painful lesson for Toyota.
And it will be a worthwhile case study for the rest of this industry too - as in how even the best can get caught up in their own delusions and lose focus - for decades to come.
That’s all I got for this week.
~The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism~
Sir William Osler