Four Years of Trump Will Cost Us Over One Billion Dollars

Experts have estimated that it will cost one million dollars per day to provide security for Trump at Trump Towers. We already have a place for him to live, its called the Whitehouse. If he wants security at Trump Towers, let him pay for it himself. After all, he is a billionaire.

No votes yet

One billion dollars? That's a deal compared to what President Obama cost us.

Debt Under Obama Up $9,000,000,000,000

From the article:
On Jan. 20, 2009, when Obama was inaugurated, the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08, according to data published by the U.S. Treasury.
As of the close of business on Friday, Sept, 30, the last day of fiscal 2016, the total federal debt was $19,573,444,713,936.79. At that point, the total federal debt had increased under Obama by $8,946,567,665,023.71.

We, the Great Unwashed, are nine trillion dollars in debt thanks to the Obama administration. That's in addition to the debt that has been run up since the 1960s.

I don't blame the Ayatollah Obongo for all of this; just the nine trillion Himself could have not spent.

So if Trump costs the US one billion, he's a real bargain.

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

I guarantee that Lyin' Don will add a significant amount of money to our national debt. The last time we had a POTUS who had a cooperative Congress, and who wanted to cut taxes a lot, and increase defense spending a lot at the same time, the national debt nearly tripled in his 8 years in office. (The actual increase was 186.7%.) The was under Ronnie!! Do I believe the national debt will double or triple under Lyin' Don The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like? Probably not. But it will be up significantly. We can all watch and judge.

Your a moron. Quoting another right wing loser site (Cnsnews) LOL as fact. Low IQ asswipes like you swallow this kind of bullshit right up. Give your boy friends over at TT a big kiss for me.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Says the one who routinely cites Politico and HuffPo.

News flash CNS is just as reputable as those two.


And Politico and HuffPo are just as "reputable" as CNS, too.
Personally, they are all too biased for me.

Bias in media does not mean they are not credible. It means they will likely draw different conclusions from the same facts.

If you look through my comments you'll note that I regularly read HuffPo and Politico. I've read CNS as well.

What I don't do is use places who don't require two separate sources for a story before going to print. Examples on the left are RawStory and ThinkProgress examples on the right are WND and InfoWars.

Everyone should read news sources that they disagree with in order to have a well rounded opinion and get the facts from both sides.

What DH has done here is said right wing sources are too biased to be credible yet she quotes left wing biased sources as credible. It's called confirmation bias and she fell into it's trap.


You are free to read anything you like.
I mostly watch ESPN and CNBC. While driving, I mostly listen to 97.1, sports talk radio out of Detroit. Sometimes I listen to a local station when it broadcasts ESPN radio shows. I watch local news, mostly for the local weather report. I also go to local TV websites on occasion.



You tell him, DH! Dalepertchik appreciates your constructive criticism.

Trump will bring the "pay to play" tactic, which he accused Hillary of doing, to new heights.
He will make billions in his new position.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.