Hillary's Militia Caught on Hidden Camera

Click on "Read More" below--and you will find a link to a video that will make you suspect that the U.S. is traveling down the path to Communism-like government that will control the media, mistreat the mentally-ill and homeless for the benefit of the Government, and use union members as knee-bashing bullies--all the while making fun of them.

Please take 16 minutes to view this video, and hear the first-person reports of how the Democratic National Party is engaged in the activities noted above. We can do three things: ignore it, be afraid of it, or stop it.


Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Sounds like Trump propaganda.

If you listened to Limbaugh the last few days, you know (or knew already) that the Clintons and the media are "in it" together, are corrupt beyond anything my fellow baby-boomers ever though possible in this country. Trump rally protesters have now been proven to be paid to disrupt rallies. Hillary has been selling access for years. The Clintons, through their foundation basically raped Haiti financially.

But see, this is a major war between American citizens who remember a decent America and the media. We finally think someone came along who could cut the liberal/communist media down to size.

The best political speech I EVER heard was by then Rep. Bob Dornan. I taped it and play it occasionally for anyone interested. Trump, even at this late date, should get and view a copy. It was either 1992 or 1993 C-PAC annual convention. Broadcast on C-Span. Two things I recall him saying in particular: READ WHITAKER CHAMBERS BOOK! and (holding up a figure he carried around of a baby the exact size of a baby in early gestation)... THIS IS A BABY, CREATED BY GOD.

And you know how the media is saying that there is "little" voter fraud. In one election (which I believe Dornan lost when his district became more Hispanic) - it was PROVEN that over 600 illegals voted against him in that one election.

Oh, and that early '90's C-PAC speech, that is where he related that Nancy Pelosi cornered him in the cloakroom at the Capitol, and asked him: "Bob Dornan, what if you daughter was raped by a black man?" Which Dornan accurately described as a "racist" question.

Is the Limbaugh your talking about the drug addict who made millions lying to right wing dumb asses? Tell the truth.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

her skewed information...from the MSCM (MainStream Conservative Media). And she believes every word they state and/or write! Like so many ideologues, FG tries to avoid any facts, and/or any sources which might lead her to doubt her beliefs.

For the record once again...on TV during the day I mostly watch ESPN and CNBC -- (that's right, NOT MSNBC...I find them to be too biased.) At night, I watch a few mainstream entertainment shows, but I often turn to the Travel Channel, the History Channel, or HGTV shows about rehabbing houses. In the car, I most often listen to sports talk radio.

I watch CNN mostly. I like the host on their shows,Copper, Bliztzer and Tapper. What is hilarious to watch is the round tables Copper mostly host when they have Trump stooges
Jeffrey Lord and Kayleigh McEnany sit there and defend everything that Trump says or does. If Trump came out and said shit taste good, they would agree with it. Too funny.
Also, the Tales from the Crypt guy look alike Rudy Giuliani, who along with the quarter ton of fun guy Chris Christie both no doubt looking to get a job in the cabinet if Trump would win, are firmly attached to Trump's nut sack. Finally the Newt complaining about the Media Bias and how the media covers Trump in a negative way alot more than Clinton.Trump comes out every day with another insulting and stupid statement while Clinton just sits back and says nothing. Now who do you think the media is going to talk about.It?
I'm all for change and tired of the career politicians also. Its too bad the right couldn't come up with a better candidate and I don't mean those 16 other idiots that ran in the primary
This whole election bullshit is basically what goes on in Toledo to with no good candidates to choose from..

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

the greatest irony, IMHO, is Lyin' Don and his sycophants complaining that his statements get too much attention from the media, and Hillary's do not get enough coverage. The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like, also never met a mirror he didn't like, nor a camera he didn't like! He craves attention, as a prototypical narcissist does, but then complains when news organizations give him the attention he craves. What a piece of work!
If those who advise Lyin' Don could just get him to shut up some times, he could well be winning this thing! Look. I watched the third debate. The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like, started the debate looking like a different person. He was totally under control. He never interrupted. He stated his positions clearly. He did not make inflammatory statements. He did not interrupt either Hillary or Chris Wallace. But, Lyin' Don has a mental problem. He could not keep it together for even half of the debate time. He simply does not comprehend how insulting to ALL WOMEN it is, to interrupt Hillary and say that she is, "Such a nasty woman!" He doesn't understand that while interrupting the other debater is SOP in such a forum, interrupting the moderator -- a conservative FOX News moderator at that -- is terrible, and insults many of the undecided viewers who want to judge the debaters fairly.

I voted for (gulp) John Edwards (yuck). In 2016, I voted for Bernie. I am not an unabashed Hillary fan. But, between her and Lyin' Don, it is no contest. Hillary all the way!
Now, if Bill Weld headed the Libertarian ticket, I'd have a personal conundrum. Guy Johnson, even though he was an actual governor for 8 years, seems to know less about the world and foreign policy then does even the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like. And I saw Jill Stein interviewed. To me, she seems to be one of those people who are well known enough to get the nomination of a minor party, but really did not prepare herself for a serious campaign. In this way, she reminds me a little of Guy Johnson. If Guy and Jill do not take the situation seriously, why should I seriously consider voting for either one of them?
On the other hand, Bill Weld has obviously studied the issues and understands the seriousness of this election. This not only makes him a better candidate than Guy or Jill, IMHO it makes him a better candidate than the Republican standard-bearer!

It is ignorance like yours that has put our Country in the sad shape it's currently in. Lucifer himself would be a more honest candidate than HIllary.

If she wins, here's hoping the U.S. implodes to the point where all of the people who voted for Hillary lose their jobs, freedom to worship is abolished (via her extremist Supreme Court appointments), the poor get much poorer, and the Arab counties to which Hillary owes her soul impose sharia law and people living "alternative" lifestyles are "taken care of" by Islamic extremists.

Let's have some consequences for the people who vote for Hillary.

scenarios every election year. I thought that everything you state here was going to happen if Obama got elected in 2008! I thought that everything you refer to here was going to happen, assuredly, if Obama were to be re-elected in 2012!

There is no sharia law in the United States. There will be no sharia law under Hillary. The U.S. did not implode under Obama, and we will not implode under Hillary. Americans are better than you and the other extreme right-wingers give them credit for!

Finally, in America, unlike what you, aka GALT, and Lyin' Don The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like really believe. we elect a POTUS every 4 years, NOT a dictator. America is founded upon the principal of the separation of powers among three branches. Go back and study how American government works.

Finally, I am fed up with one thing that the right-wingers love to talk about. How can we hold Obama responsible for the nation not doing better, when he has no control over the legislative branch. As I recall, the U.S. House of Representatives has been under Republican control for almost 6 full years, now. And the Republicans have controlled the Senate for nearly 2 full years. I remember well, the night of the elections of 2014. After the Republicans gained control of the Senate, the Republican leaders proclaimed that they would bombard the White House with bill after bill and force Obama to veto them. Has that happened? NO!!! They have done almost NOTHING! And, I do have proof. Obama has vetoed less bills in his nearly 8 years in office than W did in the previous 8 years. Where are all these great Republican legislative initiatives? NOWHERE! The Republicans claim to hate Obamacare. Have they formulated their own plan and passed it through the Congress they control? NO!!! THEY DO NOTHING BUT BLUSTER!! Sounds like they got the right nominee for POTUS to represent them all righty!
Hillary is not perfect. She has actually admitted to making mistakes, unlike her opponent. I may not always agree with her on all of her positions in this very complex world, but at least she knows what she's talking about. At least she's willing to study and learn. Hillary is not the dangerous candidate in this election. The person who loves war, even "nukes" is the dangerous one!

British website called "The Week." It basically decries the fact that the Republican voters in the primaries did a terrible job of selecting a candidate in this POTUS election. Here are a few specific quotes:
First, the title of the opinion piece: "Why any half-competent foe could have clobbered Hillary Clinton at the final debate"
Second, "At several moments during the third presidential debate, and especially in its first half hour, the country caught a fleeting glimpse of what might have happened this year if the Republican Party had nominated a half-way competent candidate to compete against Democrat Hillary Clinton."
Third, "But of course Donald Trump isn't any opponent. He's a catastrophically flawed opponent — a man consumed by anger, resentment, and contempt; who lies and exaggerates flagrantly, transparently, and continuously; who treats women like garbage and then flamboyantly pronounces that 'no one respects women more than I do'; who tosses off gratuitous insults for no discernable reason at all ('such a nasty woman'); who thinks nothing about throwing around civically poisonous nonsense about 'rigged' elections and then refuses to back away from the accusation even when given the chance; who manages to demonstrate dozens of times in 90 minutes on a debate stage that he has no business getting within half a mile of the Oval Office."
And, finally, something that describes some here who get nearly all of their information from sources which reinforce their own beliefs, rather than getting a balanced variety of opinions, "Trump's replies? They rarely amounted to more than petulant and peevish gesturing in the direction of a rebuttal. If you're inclined to trust Trump (someone must, right?) and you spend all day immersed in Fox News and Breitbart, then maybe some of Trump's responses to Clinton in the debate's final 45 minutes made semi-coherent sense. But I suspect most viewers were left thinking, 'What the hell is this guy ranting about? He sounds like a lunatic.'"
If you still want to read the entire article, here's the link: http://theweek.com/articles/656427/why-halfcompetent-foe-could-have-clob...

Donna (May I Call You) Honey--you lost me at "I watch CNN mostly."

You can call me daddy.
I watch CNN as opposed to your station Fox news because most of the people on Fox news are whinny little bitches, are very annoying and bias.
The main reason rightzingers blame Obama is because he is black.
You can't put Hillary in jail if you didn't put Bush in jail for all the lying and shady deals he did.
Trump is a moron.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Another quality post from DH!

Few on this site can make me laugh like her. She is the Baldrick of the site.


mess we are still dealing with in the Middle East today. No big deal, right?
Now, I ask seriously, which actions by a POTUS are the types of "high crimes and misdemeanors" to which our Founding Fathers were referring in the Constitution as grounds for impeachment? Is it using the power of the Presidency to select only certain intelligence reports to make a case for sending tens of thousands of our best Americans to fight in an unnecessary war, or lying about having an affair while in the White House? Which conduct is more germane to the actual job of being the POTUS? Which improper actions by which of these POTUSes led to the wasteful, tragic deaths of over 4000 of America's great young people, along with so many others?
I want to reiterate that I have NO PROBLEM with the manner in which George H.W. Bush conducted the first Iraq War. I read his book which discussed why he did what he did, and it made perfect sense. Among other things, Bush 41 warned that if he had removed Sadam Hussein from power, evil as he was, it would have created a power vacuum which would have led to a long-term commitment of U.S. forces, with no end in sight. I read Bush 41's book. W declared proudly that he never read his father's book. Hmmm...

You're still talking about GWB? Man it's been 8 years get over it already.


That's all.

And I wasn't discussing either. You should see a therapist. That's a real problem.


Donnahoney mentioned W.

I didn't. Your reply was to me.


It's all connected on a thread...Duh!

But my discussion with her did not discuss Bush.


Whatever, Mikey!

much, I guess.
Here's a quote from Steve Schmidt. Steve Schmidt was a leading strategist for John McCain in 2008. Apparently, he is a frequent "opposition" guest on MSNBC's, "The Morning Joe." Here is what he stated, "...a person who I think is filled with grievance, filled with anger who has a divisive message for the national stage when we need leaders in both parties to have a unifying message. . . . The lack of preparedness was a bad thing and the total disinterest in being more prepared and rectifying that is something that disqualifies.” Now, to me this well-defines Lyin' Don, the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like. No!! This was Schmidt apologizing for his role in getting McCain to select Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008! He is, indeed, describing Sarah Palin. This quote is from 2011. Schmidt was describing why it would have been bad for the country to have Palin elected, and why she should not be considered seriously as a political leader in America.

Schmidt also stated this just yesterday commenting on this year's race for POTUS on "The Morning Joe:" "I think she's [Hillary's] trending over 400 [electoral votes]," Schmidt said during an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." Schmidt also predicted that Democrats will take control of the Senate and are close to taking the House of Representatives. 
"If this election was today, I think Republicans are down 25 seats, as of today, with the trend line going in the wrong direction," he said.
“The panic is beginning."

IMHO, Schmidt is not right about the makeup of Congress. I see the senate as too close to call, leaning toward 51 total Republicans as of right now. This could change, of course. Because "all politics is local," I do not think that the Democrats can take control of the House. Once again, trends point to a close lineup. leaning Republican. We'll see.

Guy Johnson is a poet and novelist who lives in Oakland. Before settling down to write he lived in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, working on oil rigs, in bars and bands, and on safaris.

SORRY! Gary Johnson.

Guy Johnson is the actor who starred in that 60's tv show "Lost in space".

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

As I stated, if Bill Weld were the candidate for POTUS instead of VPOTUS for the Libertarians, I would have to really think about my vote. But not with clueless Gary heading the ticket!
It's easy this way...Hillary all the way!

"the crime of trying to overthrow your country's government or of helping your country's enemies during war"
OK -- Technically, America is not at war with Russia, although a good argument could be made that, since Putin became the undisputed leader (dictator?) in Russia, we have been drawn into a new "Cold War." Be that as it may, this article caught my eye. Here's a link to it: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/10/20/amid-rigged-election...

Is Lyin' Don The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like guilty of treason? Well, you be the judge. He has multiple times praised Putin. He denies reports by several different American intelligence agencies that Putin's Russian government is behind many cyber-attacks against Americans. He even publicly requested that Russia help him by turning over illegally obtained information to him about Hillary! (Of course, when this got a LOT of negative feedback, he stated that he was being sarcastic. Sure! Right! Sarcasm!) He openly stated numerous times that Putin is a stronger leader than is Obama. To support this, he pointed to Putin's high standing in polls of Russians. In other words, Lyin' Don places more faith in opinion polls taken in Russia than he does in polls in his own country!
He has stated numerous times that the electoral system is "rigged" against him. Of course, he stated that the Republican nomination process was "rigged" against him -- until he won! He even stated that the Emmy Awards system was "rigged" against him, because his TV programs never won an Emmy!
In short, Lyin' Don, as a classic narcissist, will always blame others for his own failings. He must always win or the game is fixed. When he does win, are all things then fair?
Well, his latest comment that he will accept the electoral decision of November 8th under the one condition -- that he wins -- should be funny. If he were still merely in the entertainment field, it would be funny! But, when it engenders our longtime world rival -- if not enemy -- Russia to threaten to send "observers" to America to oversee our election process to ensure fairness for Putin's buddy, it just ain't funny!
Now, add to this the fact that The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like has clearly stated that, as POTUS, one of his first acts will be to have a full investigation of Hillary with the goal of putting her in jail. His intent seems to be to turn America into a prototypical dictatorship ( a lot like Russia?). That's what dictators do. They hold "elections," draw out their strongest opponents, deny the legitimacy of the election if they lose, declare themselves to be the "real" winner, whether that is true or not, and throw their leading opponent(s) into jail.
Sounds a lot like treason to me.

Is refusing to concede UnAmerican?


speaking about the integrity of our electoral system. "Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong declared that the American system 'relies on confidence in election results and the Speaker is fully confident the states will carry out this election with integrity.'”
Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, a Republican, said the system of elections in place is “actually more secure than it’s ever been in our nation’s history.”
And here is what Ohio's Republican Governor John Kasich said about Lyin' Don's ludicrous claims of "rigging:" "To say that elections are rigged and all these votes are stolen, that's like saying we never landed on the moon. That's how silly it is," Kasich said on CBS' "This Morning."

No one has called for anyone to concede a contested election. But, it is unAmerican -- perhaps even treasonous -- to undermine the confidence of Americans in their electoral system, and to ask a foreign power to use illegal means to give you information on an American political opponent. It is also unAmerican to threaten to jail your opponent in an election campaign. But, go ahead, Mikey. Keep defending the indefensible!

Who I am defending? I'm curious. I asked a legitimate question and I didn't ask it under the pretense of defending anyone.

"No one has called for anyone to concede a contested election. But, it is unAmerican -- perhaps even treasonous -- to undermine the confidence of Americans in their electoral system,..." So then you admit that George W. Bush rightfully won the 2000 and 2004 elections then?


did not contest an election of 2000 which Gore had legal recourse to do, because it could have done irreversible harm to our nation. Once the Supreme Court ruled on Florida, Gore conceded. I would say the same about Nixon not contesting the Election of 1960. Some people place the nation ahead of their own interests.
And, look at the numbers, Mikey. W won a clear majority in the Electoral College in 2004. No one of any prominence seriously questioned the results of that election.
All politicians have a large ego. Not very many are narcissists like Lyin' Don The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like. And, you seem to be defending him! If you're not. just say so, Mikey.

Gore did not concede. He took it back and sued the Florida SoS. According to your own words that makes him guilty of treason.

Where did I defend Trump? Please show me a quote or link.


the obviously biased, partisan decision of the U.S. Supreme Court against his position: "On Dec. 13, 2000, Gore made his public concession speech: 'Now the U.S. Supreme Court has spoken. Let there be no doubt, while I strongly disagree with the court’s decision, I accept it. I accept the finality of this outcome which will be ratified next Monday in the Electoral College.'” That sounds awfully definitive to me!
It's called accepting the rule of law, EVEN IF YOU DISAGREE WITH IT! It's called REAL PATRIOTISM. That is a real commitment to the American system of government and how it functions, EVEN WHEN YOU DISAGREE WITH IT!!

You are right now defending Lyin' Don The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like, by trying to justify his statement that the electoral system in America is "rigged," and he has a right to not commit to accepting the outcome of the election unless he is the winner!
And you did NOT comment upon Nixon's concession of the 1960 Election, even though there appeared to be many voting irregularities in that election. It fascinates me that the only POTUS to ever resign because his henchmen worked to skew the system in the 1972 Election and he did his best to cover it up and order others to cover it up, actually took a real positive stand back in 1960 to NOT challenge the system. Once again, I find Nixon's actions in 1960 to be truly patriotic!

Elections are held in November not December. Gore DID NOT concede the election. He conceded his recount after he was told if he counts one county he MUST count them all!

By your previous description he is a traitor.

If Trump wins will you be leaving the country?


You can deny it all you want, but you really seem to have a bromance with The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like, Mikey!

Oh! I'm not going anywhere, unless I die. I am getting quite old, you know.
If Hillary wins, are you emigrating permanently to another country, Mikey?

No "bromance" here. My ballot was sent in with President blank. In the primary I voted Rubio. I was ready to vote Libertarian but Johnson is no Libertarian.

I do get a good laugh at how much Trump pisses you guys off. The next four years are going to be fun.

Remember when I said here to never underestimate how bad of a candidate Hillary was. Of course I could still be wrong. I predicted here Trump would not win the primary and I was wrong (so much for bromance).


on your ballot. Considering your bent to always support the Republican candidate, your inaction this year is good for Hillary.

And having Lyin' Don as your Commander-in-Chief should worry you a lot more than it worries me!

Have a good day!

Who cares if he "concedes'? They are making a big deal out of nothing. If he wants to be a sore loser and not not "concede", it just makes him look bad.
Please don't compare this possible scenario with what happened in Florida back in 2000.
If Trump wins the popular vote by 1/2 million votes, then all of a sudden has vote counting issues with hanging chads in a state where the Secretary of State is a Democrat and his/ her boss, the governor of the state is also a Democrat and the brother of the Democratic candidate, then you can compare "apples to oranges". To do so now is ignorant.
Here is another good laugh, The rightzingers act as though the years 2000 to 2008 and all the damage done to this country during hat time never happened. Now that is funny. LOL

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

After that, I guess I'll just have to add to the Donna and call you Honey, too!

Trump is a Hitler clone.

At least Hitler was a dog lover.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

If Trump wins will you be leaving the country or will you stay?





I will spin this riddle like Fox news would if they were against Trump.
What is the difference between Bill Cosby and Donald Trump?
One used drugs to get woman and the other used Tic Tacs.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

What is the difference between Bill Cosby and Donald Trump?
Both used their power and fame to abuse woman.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Donna, question.

If Trump wins will you be leaving the country?


Hi Mikey. Why would I leave the country if Trump Wins?

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Well a lot of liberals, Rosie O'Donnell and Amy Schumer as examples, say they will. So I've just tried to gage where the left in Toledo sees themselves under a Trump Presidency.


I'm just trying to gage where the right in Toledo sees themselves under a Hillary Presidency.

No. I will not.


Just askin'.

You'll have to ask someone on the left. Don't give a shit what liberals do.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

I wouldn't leave. I want to be here for the impeachment celebration.

Anyone who names their child "Baron" is a jack off in my humble opinion
There is a video of Trump admitting that he abuses women. 11 woman come out and accuse him of what he already admitted he has done. He then says they are all lying.
Just like the right zingers pretend the years 2000 to 2008 never happened, they just ignore this character flaw like it never happened. Now that is pathetic!

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

goes much, much further. How many other women have been paid off by The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like? People receive such "hush money" with the legal proviso that they must give the money back if they disclose the deal. Wealthy people, especially wealthy men, pay people off all the time to keep their mouths shut, particularly when criminal charges could be filed against them.
Like most of you, maybe ALL of you, I am sick of this entire campaign, but I have heard recordings from political ads. On one, Lyin' Don is heard to say that one reason why he loves sponsoring beauty pageants, is because he can go into the dressing rooms at any time, and no one admonishes him in any way, no matter what state of dress or undress the contestants are in. On another political spot, a person is heard stating that The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like would enter such dressing rooms in which there were females as young as 15 years old! Could that be a criminal act? I cannot say for sure, but it seems awfully unseemly to me! What a great POTUS candidate the self-proclaimed "family values" party, the Republican Party, has in 2016!

who claims to having had a 10 month affair with Lyin' Don The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like, WHILE HE WAS MARRIED TO HIS CURRENT WIFE! She was paid $150,000 and "The Enquirer" never published the story. Hmmm... Here's the link: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/national-enquirer-shielded-donald...
The article reiterates the fact that Lyin' Don was having an affair with Marla Maples, who became the second Mrs. Trump later, WHILE HE WAS STILL MARRIED TO IVANA, his first wife!
Rich people, mostly men, do these things all of the time. To be honest, what people do in private means nothing to me, as long as they are not doing things which are illegal. However, when one is the standard-bearer for the political party which claims the higher moral ground because they call themselves the "Family Values Party," how can these Republicans justify supporting and voting for someone who has spent his entire life as a narcissist, a misogynist, and a hedonist!?
And, I've seen and heard the Hillary critics. They say that they cannot vote for Hillary and put Bill into the East Wing of the White House. They would rather have Lyin' Don, the moral reprobate, in the WEST WING?!! How hypocritical can one get?

Trump has said he would like to date his daughter. Have you seen her in public? Something is off there. Maybe Donald Duck did date his daughter. Wouldn't put it past him. The right wing evangelical the supposedly holier than thou cult is backing Donald Duck. What a bunch of hypocrites.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.