ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS--HILLARY HAS A SERIOUS HEALTH ISSUE

Tagged:  

Have you seen the video of Hillary Clinton having some sort of seizure? It's really interesting. Thank goodness that the government-controlled media isn't reporting on this so that the legions of Hillary lovers can continue to think that nothing is wrong.

Click on "Read More" to get to the Hillary seizure video. Share it on all of your social media to get the word out about this.

UPDATE: For those who seem to think the video was rigged in some way, I've included an additional link that shows the seizure from several angles. At the 29 seconds point, watch how the one "reporter" is initially shocked by what she sees (and how Hillary tries to blame the seizure on "cold chai").

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd4NH9jKNas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMHOcmDVBP0

No votes yet

I believe it will only be a matter of time before the stresses of a campaign (not to mention the never-ending email scandal) will make it impossible for Hillary to keep--whatever this brain-related illness is--a secret.

Here's another interesting video. It shows her coughing jags and the extensive break she had to take during one of the debates (also, pay close attention to her eyes during her acceptance speech).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDa9eArn4SQ

If there were any real journalists left, they could make a name for themselves investigating Hillary's health issues.

Maybe its just old age and the stress of having to be on your game 24/7. Same with Stump.
Could be that is why he says all the dumb shit that he does.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

So you've observed the "old age" people in your life having spasms like the ones Hillary is having in the video?

video takes a 3 second problem and puts it on a loop, showing the same thing over and over again from different angles and in slo-mo to make it appear to be much worse than it was. Keep in mind...Hillary is YOUNGER than her opponent!
Second, Hillary functioned well enough to be called a "great" Secretary of State by none other than her current Republican opponent. I wonder what has changed since he said that? Oh, yeah. He's running against her! In addition, in her 8 years as a U.S. Senator -- meaning she was re-elected after serving effectively for 6 years -- Hillary is best remembered for being successful by working with senators from BOTH political parties. Apparently, whatever medical conditions she has, have not presented a problem in Hillary's carrying out her duties as either a U.S. Senator or as Secretary of State!
Finally, and most importantly, whatever Hillary's problems may be, Lyin Don presents a much more dangerous threat as POTUS. What happens if the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like is insulted by some foreign leader? Might he order the U.S. military into action to avenge his "honor?" Might he even use nuclear weapons and trigger a war which destroys civilization as we know it, just to avenge a verbal insult? Lyin Don the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like has a brain that NEVER works right! Now, that's scary!

I think people understand that the loop is to allow the viewer to see the video multiple times (and in slow motion) without having to back-up the video.

I'm unfamiliar with Hillary's accomplishments over the 6 years to which you refer. Could you tell us about several?

Just as you would never vote for Trump, I would never vote for Hillary. But I believe posts like Galt's are educational for the people who are "casual" voters and observers of politics. I have forwarded this post to several people I know in this category and they are surprised and concerned with what they see. Since the dinosaur media is all in for Hillary, websites like Swampbubbles provide an outlet for unfiltered posts.

to make it appear worse than what it is. One does not have to loop what Lyin' Dan says. He says it over and over again.

I am not going to do your research for you. I'll just point out that Hillary was an important part of the decision to kill Osama Bin Laden, after W tiptoed around the issue for seven long years!

And, SP, I'm sure you see yourself as a loyal Repubican. That's OK with me. But, if you were a high profile Republican and crossed the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like on just one issue, he'd treat you just like he treated Rubio, and Fiorina, and Cruz, and Kasich, and McCain, and all the Bushes, and puppy dog Christie, and...(I could go on and on.)

"Well first of all, I know her very well and I know her husband very well and I like them both. And they are, uh, you know, just really terrific people. I like them both very much.
"But I think you’ll be, you know, you’ll be looking at the record of Hillary Clinton. And how did she do as secretary of state? Probably above and beyond everybody else and everything else. You’ll be looking at her record and everybody else is, will be looking at her record."

Oh what a difference 3 short years, (when Clinton was NOT Secretary of State BTW), and a campaign for POTUS makes in the opinion of Lyin' Don!

I'm still missing two things in Dale's retorts:

1. A list of accomplishments of Hillary that he referenced earlier
2. If he thinks Hillary's spasm/seizure in the unlooped video link indicates she has a health issue

1. I SP I was NOT going to do your research for you.
2. I am not a doctor, nor did I play one on TV.
And 3. Lyin' Don has a brain that is always a disaster!

Dale, this is going to appear rude--and I apologize for that--but it is people like you who the Clintons know they can count on to defend and vote for them without regard for what they do.

This is very typical of the ruling class. People with Ivy League educations who believe that you are incapable of knowing what is best for you--so they will act on your behalf--and you will thank them for that. They are richer, smarter, and more cunning than you; yet they count on you to sit at their feet--and you do so--probably for reasons you can't exactly explain.

They count on you to deflect comments made by non-supporters about all of the questionable/illegal/unethical things they do by saying, "But Donald Trump...." You do so without shame or hesitation.

Let's see. He has an Ivy League education. He states: "I have a really good brain," to get the rest of us to just shut up and follow him! The Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like says that he is richer, smarter, and more cunning than ANYBODY! And, he counts on lemmings like you to apologize for everything he says that is erroneous and/or ludicrous! Are you sitting at his feet? Can you explain why?

BTW -- FYI...up to this point in time I have NEVER voted for Hillary Clinton.
Meanwhile, the Clintons did produce their most recent income tax return, and, as I understand it, they have produced about THIRTY YEARS of income tax returns. This latest one does show that they earned over $10,000,000 last year. Of course, this would be chump change for Lyin' Don, but is it really? Maybe, just maybe, the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like earned less than the Clintons did in 2015. We may never know, because Lyin' Don won't make his tax returns public. BTW -- His statement that he cannot because he's being audited is yet another lie. Warren Buffet is also under audit, and has challenged the Michelin Man, by stating that Buffet -- who is not running for anything -- will stand next to him at a public forum and will reveal each year of his tax returns for each year Lyin' Don will reveal his. But you can follow him blindly, SP. And you can continue making excuses for all of his lies, even when he refuses to back down on even the most obvious ones!

what the Clintons' tax return shows: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/clintons-tax-return-tells-us-20195217...
The commentators also speculate about why the Michelin Man who never met a burger he didn't like might not ever reveal his tax returns. It makes for interesting commentary. And I would point out that the source is CNBC, not MSNBC. Overall, the reporters and commentators on CNBC tend to be conservative investor-types. They do very little political commentating, except to speculate about how an election may affect investments.

Good morning all. Interesting discussion.. Lets agree on one thing, 99.9% of "Politicians"
are trying to get elected to help themselves first, by acquiring connections which lead to power which lead to the money rolling in. the Republican and Democratic party are both nothing more but money making machines. As long as the money changers can keep this country divided they will continue to rule.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

I'm with you on this. We really are going to need a revolution of the people. I recently watched the HBO John Adams series and it's uplifting. These people risked it all to take their futures into their own hands. I think the only way our revolution can be successful is without attachment to a political party. We've been held hostage by them for too long.

Adams was highly partisan. He and Thomas Jefferson had been very close friends during the American revolution. By the time the government was forming under the Constitution, the two men would not speak to each other! Neither they, nor most of the other Founding Fathers, wanted political parties. In general, the Founding Fathers felt that political parties got in the way of good governance in the British Parliament, but their divergent views led to the formation of the first political parties in American history: The Federalist Party, and the Democratic-Republican Party.
John Adams was a one term POTUS at a time when there were NO artificial term limits for any federal elected official. The main reason he lost re-election was because many of the swing voters thought Adams, with the help of a Federalist-controlled Congress, went too far in limiting freedom of speech with the Sedition Act, and went too far in limiting immigrants becoming citizens with the Alien Act. These two acts had been passed for mainly partisan reasons. Adams hated criticism, hence the Sedition Act. The Federalists were very aware that most new citizens supported Jefferson's party, so the Federalists wanted to limit the number of new (voting) citizens. Interesting, huh. Yes, Virginia, immigration to America was a big issue in the 1800 Election!
The Founding Fathers were not saints. John Adams did many good things in his life, but Thomas Jefferson defeated Adams when Adams ran for a second term. That's politics!

Here's a link to a video that brings up a good point. Her health is the reason Hillary hasn't had a press conference in 8 months is she wouldn't be able to handle the multiple stimuli without triggering one of these seizures. The debates should be interesting.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

over and over. Secondly, as just one example, fits of coughing can be ascribed to so many physiological causes, that to suggest Hillary's are a side effect of some type of stroke would send some of us into gales of laughter! OH! Maybe I had a stroke! It's the age-old example of looking at symptoms and seeing a zebra, when it is only a horse. Most often, the most common, simplest, and least serious diagnosis of physiological symptoms is the correct one.
Finally, at one point the voice-over calls Hillary's actions those of a narcissist. PLEASE!! There is a narcissist running for POTUS this year. It's Lyin' Don the Michelin Man who never met a burger (or a mirror) he didn't like. BTW -- He's older than Hillary, you know!

Has Lyin Don received a drug test?

Why don't Donald just release last years return if this years is still being audited as he claims? That would shut up a lot of people, unless he is hiding something like an effective tax rate of 10% or something.

Hope I didn't offend anyone!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.