White Security Guard Attacks Blind Black Man For Standing In Front Of A Resturant

A black man had dinner at a strip mall and stood outside the restaurant waiting for his ride home when a White security guard attached him causing injury. The Black Man had baggy clothes, a hoodie , a cell phone and a blind man's cane. The police ruled that the assault by the security guard was justified.

No votes yet

You're not telling us the whole story, are you?

When one posts a story but refuses to post a link to that story it's a good chance they are misrepresenting that story. Especially when such a person is an proven liar.

MikeyA

Just a reminder, MikeyA, you do not create rules for me even though you think you are entitled to do so. Look it up yourself..

I never claimed I did.

What I did was explain to you that for others to take you seriously these are the things that will get you there. So in essence they're not my rules, they're everybody's rules or the rules of the community.

MikeyA

Reality is reality regardless if anyone takes me serious. Next, you'll be saying I should be banished to the penalty box because I won't do your work for you.

No, the only rules on this site that can do that are the ones that Chris has set for us. You can break them if you like but just be prepared to suffer the consequences. He's put several of us in the penalty box for various reasons over the years.

MikeyA

I'm not breaking any rules. I'm just challenging your attitude of entitlement.

Entitlement? How am I entitled. You want to be taken seriously you'll conform to the community. If you don't you won't be taken seriously. I personally don't care if you don't want to be taken seriously. Obviously you do because you reply everytime I make a post that says your posts are ridiculous.

Edit: And recall, it was you who claimed I don't cite anything. So who is entitled?

MikeyA

Awfully defensive, aren't you?

Because it's completely wrong. The only entitled attitude is yours.

If you don't want to comply to the community's guidelines then don't expect the community to take you seriously. Yet you expect to be treated differently... that is actually entitlement.

Maybe you have a problem with comprehending what entitlement means.

MikeyA

Obviously you think you are the posting police. Don't take me seriously. It will be you who will not benefit from the truth.

You asked me for citations. I provided them. I ask you for citations you don't provide them.

So yes, until you give the same respect given to you I will not stop. Ask anyone on here. You disrespect me or unfairly disrespect any member of this community and I am relentless. Because I believe in earned respect.

MikeyA

I'm not disrespecting anyone. I have not called you a liar. I just understand that you are misinformed. Open your eyes, my brother, and see reality, instead of the world you have been brainwashed to believe is out there.

When you openly lie you disrespect everyone on here.

When you feel you're entitled to citations but are not obligated to provide them yourself you disrespect everyone on here.

MikeyA

Hey MikeyA, I would carry your assessment one step further. CharlesZ isn't stupid, is much more Conservative than he lets on, and IMHO, doesn't believe much of what he trys to get us to believe. He somewhat shows the rest of us a little bit of disrespect, but only a little bit. I would venture to say he shows more disrespect to himself than he does to us. What do you guys think?

I definitely think your right about what he believes. If he believed it he'd seek sources that support it, there are some out there. Instead he knows they are not credible and thus does not post them.

MikeyA

Your sources of information are no more credible than the sources I find. It is my opinion that the radical right-wingers only consider sources of information that support their misguided views, and try to invalidate the sources that are the truth. So, why bother.

We wouldn't know if they are more credible or not.

You don't post them.

MikeyA

You can look it up yourself.

The whole story.

Zey constantly attempts to prove there's a pattern of anti-Black racism in the United States, but largely only establishes that he's a totally delusional Liberal who is desperately in need of medication and education, if not actually a ferocious beating to get those inner demons out of his head.

I, on the other hand, do not FEEL entitled, because I AM entitled, to anything and everything I want--period!

nm.

You know who else talks? Charles.

Can't put up. Won't shut up. LOL

Looked for his sources. None.

MikeyA

Research does require some computer skills. Nice try to get me to do your work for you. I'm not taking the bait.

And we're not taking your bait. What were the names of the people involved? The city it happened in? The name of the organization or building it happened in front of?

It's very evident you're just reposting something posted originally on www.getwhitey.com or something like that, and on such sites there's a lot of crap posted as truth... just like on Stormfront. It's likely that that's why you have no source or better information.

You paranoid extremists are all the same.

When confronted with the truth conservatives always take the position that it's a lie. The Nazis used the same tactic in Germany and the United states is no different. Rather than try to resolve issues and have a nation that lives in tranquility they only desire a nation that sets themselves up as the masters and everyone else as their servants. With technology and more people willing to step up and identify those violators of human rights, the right-wingers are getting caught and prosecuted. Hopefully the days of ill treatment and murder of minorities are coming to an end. North Charleston S.C. and Baltimore MD should help the conservatives wake up. Us so-called liberals are working very hard to correct some of the behaviors apparent in oppressed people. We found that the first thing that opens oppressed people's minds is stop the oppression. When a person has fear that the majority group is going to get away with unlawfully beating and murdering them, there is no hope. Some years ago three White men encountered a Black couple taking a walk. The three men beat the Black man and then repeatedly raped his wife. When the Black man went to the police they arrested him for filing a false police report. The Black man and his wife moved to another state soon after the incident. Ironically, the three men who committed the crime all died mysteriously the next year. There has been no evidence of this type of crime in that community since.

The truth is easily provable. You have not proved a thing. You do not post the truth.

MikeyA

You have not proven anything. Post a citation to prove it is false. Or, do you feel so entitled that all you have to do is disagree if you don't like the information that is shared with you? It's a known fact that police disproportionately brutalize Black people all the time that we can't find information for. The information is not easily accessible because the police, in most cases, do a very good job of covering up their atrocities.

I looked you up on the internet to find out if you are in the military. No person called MikeA could be found. So, I should conclude, based on your logic, you are not in the Military. Based on the fact that I have encountered many people who claimed they are ex-military, but were found to be lying, what should we believe about you?

I leveled the same ammount of "proof" that you did. How is yours valid and mine not?

"It's a known fact that police disproportionately brutalize Black people all the time that we can't find information for." No it's not. There is no proof of it. In fact the inverse is true.

"I looked you up on the internet to find out if you are in the military. No person called MikeA could be found. So, I should conclude, based on your logic, you are not in the Military. Based on the fact that I have encountered many people who claimed they are ex-military, but were found to be lying, what should we believe about you?" You can believe what you wish. I have provided proof of my service to several on here to include the webmaster, Chris Myers. They can vouch for me, that I've emailed from my military account. Even provided news articles where I was interviewed about initiatives being conducted. If you don't believe me, that's fine, but there are several other credible individuals on here who can attest that what I say is true.

MikeyA

BTW

BTW, when you google the basic "facts" you give on this case... THIS THREAD is the top link.

ZC story = bullshit

MikeyA

Once again: What were the names of the people involved? The city it happened in? The name of the organization or building it happened in front of?

You've now spent far more time defending your initial, invalid posting, than you would have spent if you had just posted names and dates. That's a clear sign that you're a fraud.

In your opinion, which isn't worth a teaspoon of manure. Where is your citation that shows that the amount of time I'm spending defending my initial post is evidence of me being a fraud. It is my right to spend as much time as I want and the way I want.

Citation: this very thread. You've responded 13 times since your initial post. If we assume that each post took a minute and a half to write that means you've spent 20 minutes defending your b.s.

Now because you lack credibility none of us are willing to believe that you spent more than 20 minutes researching the case you claim. You can't even post basic facts pertaining to it.

MikeyA

I used to go to a local eatery, bar and grill. One of the customers would Bragg about his service as a Navy Seal. He even brought in documents authenticating his time in the military. After about six months it was discovered this guy was a fraud. Just because you told Chris Meyers you are in the military doesn't mean a thing. The rest of us can find no evidence of your alleged membership in the military.

Apparently reading is not a strong suit. I will highlight a portion of my post for you.

"I've emailed from my military account." So please tell me how one fakes a .mil email address?

MikeyA

I haven't paid any attention to the email address you use and don't care. I can email using a State email account, but I don't work for the State.

Only way that's possible is if you are a dedicated contractor and that would mean you still answer to state even tho they are not your employer.

But my use of email does prove my relationship to the USMC. Combined with the articles where I am mentioned that meets abundance of proof.

MikeyA

So, the US government allows you to use our tax dollars to spread your venomous propaganda? I only use the State's computer system for business only pertaining to the State. I guess you and Hillary Clinton have something in common.

See right there. If you are a State Dept employee I'd advise you to reeducate yourself on the State Dept's policies concerning email and internet usage. This is actually extremely similar to the DoD policy which still references the same government Communication usage.

Both allow for personal use of internet and email, provided it does not interfere with stated missions. By accessing personal email or using work email for personal use one consents to their email being archived, searchable, and open to subpeona. Essentially you waive your right to privacy.

Also you agree to not use it to speak against the Federal government, but that is true also on your personal computer. You'll note in all of my posts I have disagreements with members and institutions of our government, yet I always remain respectful of the individuals and the positions they hold.

MikeyA

My work with the State forbids me from using their computer system for personal use. Your mind set of entitlement continues, my friend. You obviously think that you are entitled to decide I should break the rules.

and State Department.
I believe ZC works for the State of Ohio, not the State Department of the U.S. Government.
Am I right?

If that's true then ZC is truly trying to mislead.

My proof of which is this post. "So, the US government allows you to use our tax dollars to spread your venomous propaganda? I only use the State's computer system for business only pertaining to the State. I guess you and Hillary Clinton have something in common."

He clearly understands I'm working for the US government (meaning Federal gov't) and he talks about his work for State in the same breath as if they are the same thing.

I clearly approached the subject with the understanding of the Dept of State as laid out in my post about them and their shared commonality with the Dept of Defense.

MikeyA

I do work for the State of Ohio, Michigan, and several other States. I do no work for the Federal Government.

State email account

Give us an example. Just all the stuff after "@" in the email address.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.