New rule - vulgar usernames and images will no longer be tolerated - retroactive

I am getting tired of vulgar images and usernames - starting today (and it is retroactive), any vulgar image, image with a vulgar term in it, and a username that is vulgar will be blocked. 2 usernames that everyone is familiar with have been blocked until they send me a new username that meets this criteria. If you see an image with vulgarity in it, please flag the post and I will look at it. I don't read everything on the site, but I have not tolerated this from day 1 although I have allowed it in usernames to a certain extent - but the vulgar images and the increase in them has worn out their welcome. Users that consistently violate this function will have their postings restricted to text only.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)

Good move Chris. This will hopefully keep MikeyA and his alias from posting his filth on here.

It will keep you and Bushblows from posting filth on here....

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

Technically you could say that Bush blows like the wind, huffing and puffing, or unpredictable and often pointless.



LOL, there's actually not much I've posted that would fall under these guidelines.

However your frequent comments of "closet queers" and references to felatio would qualify.


I hope this includes photo shopped images. With new image gathering technology these images can be easily swept up in huge databases. The originators can find themselves in deep doo doo!

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Looks like Willard and his ilk are out of ammo. Nobody will miss their shenanigans.

The intent of these "filth" postings has always been to shut down discussion. Hope this works. Hackers and trolls tend to think up new ways around rules.

Thank you again Farmergal for exposing MikeyA/Bushblows as the filthy piece of shit that he his. The other loads who replied above are taken in by him cause they are scared babies.

Wouldn't the term "filthy piece of shit" be considered vulgar?

Bush in '16!


Not if you were describing williard.

Read What Chris said , user names and pictures you dumb ass.

Chris said "image with a vulgar term in it"

It's not unreasonable to assume that he has a problem with vulgar terms. Yes he quantified it with within an image but what is the difference between a picture with a vulgar term written or just writing a vulgar term? Vulgar terms are vulgar terms in whatever format they are displayed. I don't think I made some gigantic leap in rationale.


Thank You!

What does G-man stand for, Girlie man? LOL

If you were wearing a hat and shoes, and I removed them what would be left??? right! a pile of doo dooo buwahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.