violence after the Zimmerman trial

Do you expect violence in Sanford or elsewhere if George Zimmerman is aquitted? The Sanford police chief and mayor both do. What does that say about how they see the African-American population of Sanford? What does it say about you if you expect Blacks in Sanford or elsewhere to riot if Zimmerman is aquitted?
Do you expect violence in Sanford if Zimmerman is found guilty? Will the Euro or the Hispanic population riot as a response to the verdict? What is it about the two cultures that cause them to respond so differently? Enquiring minds want to know.
It so sad that many people just assume Blacks will respond by rioting when a court case doesn't go the way they expect. When will African-American leaders respond to this violence by calling for it to end, and will Jackson and Sharpton take any pre-emptive moves to calm the community in the same way they spoke out at the cases' beginning?

No votes yet

I believe there will be no violence either way. If the jury is hopelessly deadlocked and Zimmerman is not rettryed who knows what might happen. It is my opinion, if by some chance Zimmerman is acquitted he might have to move to his mother's homeland.

Of course there are going to be a few Black riots when Zimmerman is rightfully aquitted. Why do you think we've spent recent years buying up all those rifles, pistols and ammo for same? Answer: Because we have a racist President who has acted to supress Whites, through the actions of his Atty Gen, Holder (same skin color, we must note).

Zimmerman has already received significant death threats, the utmost of which should have been prosecuted by Holder since it was so egregious. But he didn't even investigate. And we know where those orders came from.

Zeyad's comments above only support what I say. There's a movement out there to "get" Zimmerman based on what he did and his skin color. None dare call this targeting of Zimmerman racism... except that I dare.

What this country needs is a few hundred Liberals laying dead with their diversity pets, killed on camera with bright sprays of blood. That should send their sick little culture retreating back to the classrooms and ghettoes that birthed it in its unholy fashion.

Then are blacks going to take it out on Mexicans. Zimmerman describes himself as Latino/Hispanic and he looks the part. Or will the media that’s portraying him to be technically white, fuel the violence against whites.

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

No, Blacks are going to take it out on any part of society that isn't Black, meaning anything that can be looted and then turned into crack cocaine and cheap liquor.

I wonder if I could join the auxiliary members for MS-13? Just until the Bloods, Crips and New Black Panthers have decided that they've had enough for a while and find someone else to go to war with. Like the Gray Panthers, maybe.

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

I am very ant-gang, but maybe the Crips, Bloods, etc. organized themselves to protect themselves against people like you. There is protection in numbers.

What you really are is anti-intelligence. You win the Darwin award for this week's SwampBubbles dumbest post. Aren't you proud of yourself?

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

History shows that oppressive people seek out people they have determined to be weaker than themselves and try to isolate people who can't protect themselves. When they find out these people can protect themselves adequately they go on to easier targets. Madjack, your statement is unrealistic. Everybody has a right to protect themselves by any means necessary. The Great American Hero Malchom X made it quite clear that protecting ones self is intelligence not anti-intelligence. There are some people who think that they should be able to impose there will on whomever they want and resistance is not allowed.

"There are some people who think that they should be able to impose there will on whomever they want "

Yet you support Obamacare, which forces people to buy a product from a private company.
I don't remember you saying it, but I'll bet you support no smoking in privately owned business.
You support welfare which takes money from the producers and pays people to stay home.

The list goes on and on. You talk like a Conservative, but obviously are a Liberal.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

I do support affordable healthcare for all citizens. I am against smoking anywhere except on your own property - If you want to kill yourself, friends and family, that's your perrogative. I rather the government spend money on feeding disadvantaged citizens rather than on super weapons that will destroy all of us.

Gangs are organized to create a criminal structure. The only thing they're protecting themselves against is law enforcement.

Today's inner city gangs were formed for protection. The Euro gangs that were formed in this country were formed to commit crimes.

Wow

When you've got a second between racist rants and bemoaning the ways that the black man is keeping you down, you might want to look into George Zimmerman's family background. He listed himself as hispanic on his voter registration card.

There's a city full of walls you can post complaints at

What the fuck are you talking about? I know Zimmerman's Hispanic. Any photo of Zimmerman (that isn't extensively retouched by the Liberal news media, progressively made lighter and lighter in skin tone) shows he's Hispanic. Targeting him is still racist, due the racial difference between him and Martin.

Racism always cuts both ways. Liberals never learn this. Which is why we laugh at them.

GZ, the press went with "White" to advance the story line. Just like they did in Toledo years ago when a pregnant woman got shot in the stomach in the Projects. That shooter was Hispanic too, but was reclassified as a "White Mexican". When a Minority gets killed, or insulted, by a "White", it can be worth millions to the jurisdiction the act occurred in.

Just once, before I die, I want to throw a brick through a display window, and run off with a new television set!

On the looting that took place after Katrina:

"Oh, they're stealing 20 pair of jeans or they're stealing television sets. Who cares? They're not going to go too far with it. Maybe those people are so poor, some of the people who do that they're so poor they've never touched anything in their lives. Let them touch those things for once."
Celine Dion on CNN's "Larry King Live,"

I'll probably be stealing Celine Dion's flat screen when the riots start. It's OK with her if I do.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

You'll bust the TV with the brick. You really want to embarrass yourself by running down the street with a stolen, busted TV?

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

During the upcoming riots maybe we should steal people from other countries and enslave them for 500 years.

What group in this Country was enslaved for 500 years?

Anyone with a brain knows slavery was a terrible thing. Funny though, some seem to forget that it was other Africans that captured and sold Africans into slavery.
Think about this, if slavery had never happened, many of the very same people who continue to whine about this misdeed 151 years after it ended would still be living in Africa.

Please explain how any group could be enslaved for 500 years in a country that has only existed for 237?
If I told you once I told you 20 billion times, "don't exaggerate"!

"We're all riding on the Hindenburg, no sense fighting over the window seats"-Richard Jenni

This is no exaggeration. There was slavery in America in the year 1501. And I agree, Africans did sell some of their people to slave traders. Did the Africans drive the slave ships to America to re-sell these slaves. I think not. It was good old Christian Euro's.

The Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863. So for 150 years, slavery has been abolished in the U.S. That's about 3 generations--that means that current black Americans who had slavery in their ancestry have never been personally exposed to it.

If your supposition is that blacks haven't been able to extract themselves from the effects of slavery, then they never will. So, it might be best for our Country to generally accept this and end all special considerations that blacks are given for employment, college admissions, loans, etc.--because as you have implied, blacks can't seem to match or exceed the actions of the "Euros."

I agree with you that cultures are different. They have different expectations, they have different backgrounds, they have different value systems, and they have different ways of dealing with things. Let's accept that, call it like it is, and let every culture segregate itself accordingly to its own wishes. The great integration experiment hasn't worked.

Institutional racism and slavery still exists. When is that going to be abolished.

Concrete examples please.

Example: The City of Toledo employs people of several races in many of its departments. If you review salaries you will find there is a tremendous pay disparity involving minorities. Minorities that are non-union are typically paid 33 percent less than Euro's who perform the same job and who have equal to or greater service time, experience and performance.

What slavery still exists? Define it.

But institutional racism surely exists. It's encoded into affirmative action. And it's wrong. Morally wrong. You know this, deep down, below your absurd Liberal facade.

There are 3-4 generations in each century. 3.5 x 1.5 is at least 5 generations. No one living today can claim slavery had anything to do with their lives. Everyone living today was born free. Slavery has totally dropped away as a social factor. No matter how you define slavery's effects, you can easily find Whites who are more affected by those than Blacks. There were a lot of poor Whites in the Old South, too.

As for today, "born free" is sadly only up to a point. What we're not free from, is a new form of slavery, the welfare state. The makers who pay into it, are really enslaved to it. And the takers who so-calledly benefit from it, are really enslaved to it. Big government is the only major problem facing Americans today. And the Liberals can't even understand why.

Bad idea. This time people will decide to do their own work.

Of course there will be riots. The blacks will riot no matter what the verdict is. Case in point, what happens in Detroit after a Pistons game, be it win, lose or draw?

So park your car inside and load your shotgun. Keep a fire extinguisher or three handy, and prepare for a power outage.

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

Spot on, MJ. We;re long overdue for a few cities getting burned to the ground, IMHO.

I listened to both mothers say it was their son's voice on the 911 tape. Martin's mother was more convincing. Zimmerman's mother sounded like she was in an election. Voice experts should be able to tell it is Zimmerman's voice. To me the voice sounds like a boy's voice, not a thirty year old.

Yeah, and Martins' mother sounded like someone that can't wait to hit another jackpot in a lawsuit.

She should. A murderous demon murdered her son.

Self defense isn't murder. How many times do you have to be told that?

When Zimmerman walks, you're going to have to make a post on this very blog, that that is right. We need you to say: "Self defense isn't murder."

In this country, attacking and killing a man for walking down the street with Skittles is self-defense? Next you'll be saying that the gangster drive-by's of the 1930' were welcome wagons.

Nobody attacked anyone for possession of skittles. How many times do you have to be told that?

Skittles and a bottle of soda were the only weapons Martin had, so that must be the reason Zimmerman attacked him. Unless, you're agreeing that Zimmerman profiled Martin and confronted and attacked Martin for no reason at all.

Testimony by Zimmerman and his wounds as documented show that Martin used his hands and fists. There are two types of assault under U.S. law: Unarmed assault (generally considered a misdemeanor) and armed assault (generally a felony). Both count as assault, in case you're still having so much trouble with English. You don't need to have a weapon in order to perform assault. And you can defend yourself against it with your utmost effort if you wish, including using a weapon.

You Liberals have to be told over and over and over, but regardless of how often you're told, it's true nonetheless: Self defense even using lethal force is 100% legal in the United States of America.

I hear emigrating to Liberia isn't too difficult, Zeyad. Time for you to go to a setting that better accomodates your so-called views.

In this country, attacking and killing a man for walking down the street with Skittles is self-defense?

No, shooting a man who's pummeling you is self defense. The shooter was Zimmerman and the pummeler is Martin; therefore Zimmerman's act was self defense.

We've told you this dozens of times now. Is English your first language? Is there a language you're more fluent in, that if we used it for you, would get this simple concept through your thick Liberal skull?

She should. A murderous demon murdered her son.

What a fascinating type of person you are!

People like myself who speak the truth are often critisized. Most people are ready to embace a lie and reject the truth.

Which is exactly why I don't criticize you. There's no need. I don't want to have demons, etc., coming after me.

I was watching the Zimmerman Trial today on CNN. I found it interesting how this case is focused on whose voice was on the 911 tape instead of the fact Zimmerman profiled, stalked and murdered an unarmed teenager who did nothing more than walk down the street eating Skittles.

Because your derangement is a failure to understand the law.

Everything you mentioned does not matter. This is a self defense case. Everything leading up to the fight is irrelevant and immaterial.

What matters, what only matters by this case is this one question "Did George Zimmerman have a reasonable belief that he could be seriously injured?" If the answer is yes or maybe he walks.

The forensics support that Martin was on top. If Martin is on top there'd be no reason for him to yell "Help" seconds before the gunshot.

Since Martin is on top he is the one doing the beating. Does GZ have a reasonable belief that he could be seriously injured? Yes.

MikeyA

MIKEYA--The judge just held the toxicology report about Martins' drug use the day of the self defense shooting is now going to be presented to the jury. Skittles, iced tea and POT is surly a recipe for disaster!!!

Why is the liberal liars making a Big Show, of this one?

1) race-is involved, "white' Mexican VS a black throw away spawn -the poor, poor,felonious black boy was killed, boo f&$%^$# hoo-

2) gun- a gun was used for self preservation-liberal's hate self preservation, they actually believe that police are every where-child like thought, is dangerous and unrealistic,

3) Obummer-put his slipper in his pie hole-and said the most stupid, idiotic thing before he knew the Facts-"uh,if I had a uh son, uh he'd uh ,uh, look like uh, uh, uh, uh, Trayvon.

The 3 requirements for sops to slurp up what they are fed by NYC / DC/ LA, liberal liars.

I await the blockbuster movie of this .....willard-plays trayvon and dont tread on me-plays Trayvon's girlfriend on the phone...zerocharles-plays trayvon's grieving mother....it will be a Summer Time Monster-Bonanza Hit of the Century Film !!!

Well now that the judge has allowed medical testimony that Trayvon smoked pot it makes even more sense for Obama to say that if he had a son "he would look like Trayvon".

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/09/11-calls-becoming-heart-zimmerman-t...

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Technically it's not looking good for Mr Martin since he didn't survive his attack on Mr Zimmerman.

This entire trial is a farce. Politically motivated from top to bottom. And the charge itself was only filed so that under Florida law, the family of Mr Martin could sue for their big payday. Allegedly they've already reached a settlement with the HOA. It's like winning the lottery.

This was just one tragedy after another, really:

1. Some thug out at night, causing trouble as usual.

2. A thug attack.

3. Lethal result from the defense.

4. Political farce play in the media, including re-casting Zimmerman as a Caucasoid, as a murderer, as a racist, etc. This was so blatant that NBC edited the 911 tape in a slanderous manner.

5. Immoral lawsuits seeking money.

6. Illegal threats against Zimmerman, but no prosecution of such by the Atty General since the threats were made by Blacks.

7. A totally unnecessary trial.

8. And all those after-effects that we rightfully fear, like more media bias, rioting, even legal changes to Florida's perfectly fine body of law.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.