Not enough HEALTHY people planning to buy into BO-care

TOLD YOU SO!

This is going to be widely resisted - and scaredy-cat John Roberts notwithstanding - is going to eventually fail, because people are not going to go along with it. Just like prohibition - companies and individuals will find ways to avoid this.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100783056

Right about now, Fancy Nancy Pelosi & BO might be wishing they had been able to sell the JAIL SENTENCES for not subscribing, which was their original intent.

Wonder why so many Senators & Reps are leaving congress? Look no further than the fact that in 2014 this is all going to hit the fan.

No votes yet

These views have already been debunked on a May 31st posting on this forum. Please review past postings before dropping a load here. Thank you for your cooperation.

Yea, FG!
This article that first appeared in print TODAY was "debunked" on May 31st! THREE DAYS AGO! Get with the program!

Two-Thirds of Americans Don't Know If They Will Insure Under Obamacare
Published: Monday, 3 Jun 2013 | 12:00 AM ET

Apparently MoveOn.org, George Soros or one of the other Liberal puppet masters sent out the pre-printed "rebuttals" for this article last week. The mindless Obimbo leg humpers laped up these lies like a dog eats it's own vomit three days before this story broke.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

Did you bother to read the entire article? Obviously not. If you do, you will see the statements made in this article are the same ones debunked in the previously published article.

It's the old adage, "If you repeat something enough times, eventually some fool is going to believe it!"

(And it appears we know who that fool might be.)

When you say "previously published article"...Are you talking about the article discussed Friday, three days ago?
http://swampbubbles.com/20130531/rate-shock-california-obamacare-increas...

Is this the "previously published article" that you say debunked today's survey which we are discussing?

Because the article you yapped about on Friday May 31st about the COST of ObimboCare says NOTHING about any poll that found "Nearly two-thirds of Americans who currently lack health insurance don't know yet if they will purchase that coverage by the Jan. 1 deadline set by the ACA, a new survey revealed Monday." And the reason the article discussed on Friday doesn't say anything about a survey is because the survey wasn't released until Monday which is today.

Now, you libtarded lemming Obimbo leg humping stooge,. REREAD THAT LAST SENTENCE IN THE ARTICLE WE ARE DISCUSSING TODAY..
That sentence in TODAY'S ARTICLE that says "a new survey revealed Monday."

We'll wait. GO AHEAD AND READ THE FRIKIN ARTICLE WE ARE DISCUSSING instead of trying to lie like a fucking Obimbo leg humping dog. "a new survey revealed Monday." In case you are too ignorant to know it, TODAY IS MONDAY.

Now EXPLAIN HOW YOU DEBUNKED TODAY'S ARTICLE about a new survey revealed Monday on Friday three days ago.

Go ahead. This should be interesting. TELL US ALL HOW YOU DEBUNKED AN ARTICLE WRITTEN ABOUT A NEW SURVEY REVEALED MONDAY ON FRIDAY THREE DAYS BEFORE THIS SURVEY WAS RELEASED.

Looks like that "worm" that Tater says is eating you Libtarded Obimbo leg humping dogs brains really does exist. YOUR worm is going hungry now..

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

It's funny. In both posts NMFR accuses people of not reading through the article, both times they respond with direct quotes from the article.

In both posts NMFR doesn't present anything other than claiming the article "debunked". Oh really, what debunked it, your imagination?

NMFR justs attacks the posters rather than present new information.

Just as funny as the other day where he accused people of name calling only to respond with calling everyone else morons. LOL. Did you see how black that kettle was?

MikeyA

It was obvious from the start that Obamacare was going to result in people with good jobs and/or money to spend on health care having better care than the people who would be forced to go into the government health exchanges. In other words, Obamacare would widen the quality gap that it was supposed to close.

Organizations that want to attract and keep quality employees will continue to offer private health care that won't limit the doctors its clients can see and won't have a government bureaucrat deciding whether you qualify for a needed hip replacement.

On the other hand, the Obamacare participants will wait months to see overloaded doctors and have a government death panel determine if they are worth the expense of a pacemaker.

Here's the economics skinny of the deal:

1. Most people will continue to sponge off their employer plans. Naturally, these will continue to suck butt more and more as time goes on, since as we should well know, people are now using health insurance for health maintenance actions, for which insurance isn't designed.

2. A lot of people regardless will be on the hook for either buying naturally expensive private plans, or naturally expensive government-prodded plans through these bullshit "state exchanges". Notice the common factor. So they will have to decide if it's worth it to spend X on that sort of crap, or 1/10 of X on just paying the fine, tax, or whatever that liar Obama called it.

3. A true minority of people, like Yours Truly, will just tell the government to go and fuck itself, and will never let tax withholding rise enough so that they run a refund. Remember that Obamacare's provisions clearly stated that the IRS can NOT seize, garnish or lien in order to fulfill the fine or tax or whatever that liar Obama called it. That only leaves the ability for the IRS to seize your refund via FMS. Don't believe me? READ THE LAW. I did. It's right in there.

And even if the IRS did have the power to seize, garnish or lien, I know a way of dodging Obamacare's mandate anyway. Yeah, it's fraudulent, but so is Obamacare. The way I envisoned has already been partially invoked by certain 'insurers', who are issuing policies today that really don't cover anything. The obvious purpose of such policies is to make you look like you're covered for Obamacare, but you're not able to incur any costs upon the insurer. Some might call that fraud, but I actually call it 'patriotism'. Obamacare is unconstitutional. Period. I refuse to obey it, and I urge others to do the same.

And that's what I am telling people still in the workforce (i.e., not retired U.S. citizens) (.... or not illegal Mexicans, for that matter -- who pay no taxes, get paid under the table for well-paying jobs like constructon, but sponge off the system as if they are poor ).

People actually working/earning and paying U.S. taxes....
DO NOT RUN A REFUND!!! Exactly - tell all your freinds. What GZ said.

Hmmm. I wonder why Mr "Independent" isn't posting in this thread. Must be the shame he'd have to endure, and the crow he'd have to eat. There's never enough salt and pepper around to make that crow palatable.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.