Don't tell me what to think

Note to all media talking heads AND all politicians: Don't even dream for 5 seconds that it is your right to tell me what to think, or what conclusions to draw from the screaming-out-loud evidence - on ANY story or topic. You have the right to one opinion - your own. Just don't tell ME or anyone else, exactly what we are allowed to think.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/20/obama-dont-form-opinions-on-boston-att...

No votes yet

If these Boston bomber killers can be on Welfare and own Porsche's, get Obama-phones, have money for fireworks,6 month trips to Russia, boxing club memberships, trips to NYC to party, and etc.

I might have to get lazy, ignorant, vote for liberals, and join !
Why work ?

The 900.00 pair of shoes Johar had as his friends called him.

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

Doesn't Obama realize it's Alex Jones job to tell you what to think…

The article you posted is a perfect example of how propagandists manufacture misinformation. They use headlines they hope will be interpreted by low information folks as being actual quotes, then twist the truth to fit their agenda.

Obama isn't telling you what to think. Instead, you're letting an article from the Daily Caller do that . Obama talks about "not jumping to conclusions" as in getting the facts, which is good advice. Read the article again and pay attention to the quotation marks to find out what Obama actually said.

BO's been telling Americans what they should think about a whole host of topics - like what we should think about Americans who owns "guns and Bibles", from the first day he set foot in the White House. He doesn't even have a cohesive world view to begin with. Ever wonder, if he dislikes Christians who believe their Bible, so much.... what is he doing in all these Christian churches at memorial services?

He has a record of placating radical Islam worldwide (like Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian dictator Morsi in Egypt, who he and Hillary helped install) -- and now with the tragedy in Boston, has to find a way to excuse himself for that - with the mainstream media rushing in to help him to try to influence the opinions of millions of Americans. What I am saying, clearly I thought, is that they don't get to tell me what opinion I should have. This has been a major national security screw-up, and I'm saying DON'T YOU DARE now try to tell me it's anything other than a major national security screw-up.

He also doesn't understand the separation of powers, and tells the Supreme Court how to vote. He is far and away, both the most uninformed, and arrogant individual to ever occupy that office. And considering former President Clinton and her husband, that's saying something.

Frankly, I didn't need any article to back me up - I've been paying attention for the past 5 years.

What you really "need" is a vibrator and a porn film to watch :)

Who mans Toledo's , prisons anyways ?!

You might want to pay attention better.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Tucker Carlson is the "brain' behind The Daily Caller. The Daily Caller was recently called out for paying a guy to lie about a member of Congress they wanted voted out of office. The lie was about the elected official paying for sex with prostitutes. It was easily proved to be a lie and the foreign national who got caught lying spilled the beans on who had paid him to keep his ass out of jail.

What can one think of a news source that sinks to paying off people so they can spread lies to influence the United States Congress? And this is just one more example of The Daily Caller making up lies for their personal gain!

And if someone gets their panties in a bunch about me sharing this information, I have to ask the intent of that undergarment challenged person.

It's a lot like democrat leader Larry Flynt, who paid bounties to anyone who had dirt on Congressional Republicans.

Not, like that. Flynt wasn't looking to make shit up. If that was the case, he wouldn't have to pay people money for the info.

leader Rust Limpballs who offered a bounty to any maid who could supply him with oxycodone pills.

Rush Limbaugh's freak out response to caller when he gets reminded about his Blue Pill adventure
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/rush-limbaugh-freaks-when-he-gets-c...
Quote:
In 2006, Limbaugh was detained by United States Customs officers after returning from the Dominican Republic with Viagra in his possession. The prescription wasn't written in Limbaugh's name, so the authorities suspected unlawful possession of a controlled substance. Moreover, a simple google search of the terms "adult travel" (NSFW) reveals that the Dominican Republic has earned an outsized reputation as one of the world's hottest destinations for sex tourists.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

I couldn't get the audio to work for me, and I tried a couple of different sites. So here's the transcript. You have to read the Rush part in a bombastic voice to make it sound real, but it's worth it.

Rush: Starting in Arlington Virginia this is Seth. Welcome sir, nice to have you on the EIB network, hello.

"Seth": Thank you Rush. I'm lookin' at this and I'm seeing two adults exchanging ... well, actually seven if there were six women ... exchanging pictures in a consentual way. And i guess it's none of my business. It was none of the reporter's business. It's none of anybody else's business. How is this different ... I mean you're talking about how "smart" everybody is, you talk about how smart you are every day ... but, how is this different from you going to, you know the sexual tourist destination of Dominican Republic with a bottle of viagra and having that sprayed all over the headlines? How did you like that? Why is this different?

Rush: Well, but ... what you describe about me isn't true. And I guess what you're suggesting here is that getting caught having sex affairs is only stupid when Republicans do it.

"Seth": No, what I said ..

Rush (who by now has killed Seth's call): No, this ... you know you are, you're repeating internet rumors based in hatred and misinformation and typical brainlessness on the left. NONE of that took place. But it's people like you who present the rest of us with the greatest challenge we have in saving the country. Because general, glittering jewels of collosol ignorance like you, and your hate-filled partisanship are primarily responsible. People just like you are primarily responsible for the precarious poisition this great nation finds itself in. Because you can't be counted on for genuine, decent citizenship. You can't be counted on to protect this country when it's under assault internally. You seek your jollies in false victories over your political enemies while your country is in the process of going down in flames. Its people like you that try to make excuses for reprobates like Weiner, and Clinton and so forth while immersing yourself in lies to make yourself feel good that present a problem for the rest of us. Feel sorry for ya. You're probably capable of much more than you're immersing yourself in. I gotta take a brief time out, we'll come back, we'll continue ... right after this.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

And, I wonder how Rush Limbaugh, has anything to do with the current economic morass liberals have created ?!

Cash for clunkers, shovel ready, too big to fail, she's your typical white woman-and other vacuous ramblings are what gives nurture and comfort to those whose reality is as mucked up as anything I've ever heard in my life.

I need a vacation...$1.5 billion buys a lot of travel time for those who raid the U.S. Treasury, for personal gain.

Don't forget two unpaid for wars, a non compete Medicare drug plan and tax cuts for the 1% during war time.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Social Security and Medicare are TOTALLY funded by deductions out of your paycheck with a matching contribution from your employer. They have NOTHING to do with the Federal Deficit, so why is Congress looking to take money from those funds?

The answer is they have already taken all the money and the less they have to pay back, the more money in the federal coffers to spend on other things.

Yes, you are absolutely right, Rodeo. And, the insult is that those raiding the Social Security and Medicare, wealthy politicians and their big business owners, won't ever feel the effects of their actions. In fact, they have probably never had to pay into the fund because they make more than the cap.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.