Has Obama Committed Treason?

“Dear Leader” President Barack Hussein Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai made the announcement on Friday, January 11. Here is some of what Obama said:

“Ultimately security gains must be matched by political progress, so we’ve recommitted our nations to a reconciliation process between the Afghan government and the Taliban. President Karzai updated me on the Afghan government’s road map to peace, and today we agreed that this process should be advanced by the opening of a Taliban office to facilitate talks.”

If this isn’t treason, then I don’t know what is. The US Constitution defines treason in Article 3, section 3 thusly: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Taliban harbored al Qaeda in Afghanistan in the lead up to the 9/11 attacks o n America in September 2001. Obama even recognized the Taliban as a terrorist organization when he said, “We went into Afghanistan, because 3,000 Americans were y murdered by a terriost organization that was operating openly and at the invitation of those who were then ruling Afghanistan.”

Now that same Taliban is to have an office in Kabul, Afghanistan. That same Taliban will engage in directt talks with the democratic government in Afghanistan. I somehow don’t expect the Taliban to talk in good faith.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Ahh--it's great to be king. Obama counted on two things to get elected and then re-elected. 1) a media willing to aid and abet him and 2) an electorate who was ignorant enough to vote for him on the basis of race and party. Neither disappointed him.

So when he takes steps like opening a Taliban office to "facilitate talks," he does so knowing that most Americans won't have a clue that he did this and/or what it means.

Those Talibanese (Talibanians?) are probably laughing hysterically, as they take inventory on their weaponry.

Most of us dream of the possibility of Americans having to take a simple test consisting of relevant questions (i.e. How many Senators are there? What are the three branches of government?, etc.) before being allowed to vote. That, of course, is racist (suggesting that we can't expect minorities to have the ability to know the answers to those questions--even though they have been offered 12 years of free public education--which probably is the reason they don't know the answers to those questions).

These are very dark days in this Country. (Yep, can't wait for the "racist" accusations that will come as a result of that description.)

Obozo-2006-" raising the debt ceiling means America, cannot pay its bills."
Obozo-2013-"not raising the debt ceiling means America, cannot pay its bills ".

People actually voted twice for this scatter brained dog eating, coke head , heathen ?!

Is it any wonder WHY, Toledo, Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, and now, all of America, is spiraling downwards into the abyss of economic ruin and immorality unseen in an American "President", in all of American History ?!

Not to me it isn't...

... KNOW that the Dems have betrayed them for years, and wrecked their cities.

A self-described 41-year old black gentleman living in Detroit called in to Hannity's radio program yesterday to say exactly that. He said, basically, that he had watched Detroit go downhill his entire life, and that he blamed the Democrat party. He identified himself as a conservative - but I heard a self-described LIBERAL black woman (also from Detroit) call into the Mark Levin show after the presidential election, to say that she voted for Romney, and was not taken in by BO, that he was bad for the country. I also heard an Hispanic voter/fellow call into a 3rd radio show to echo what both of these citizens said.

Thinking citizens of all races ARE out there. Opposition to this faker is NOT a "white" or even exclusively "conservative" thing. But the national tv media will never tell you that. Which is part of why I listen to so much talk radio, as opposed to television.

... "If this isn’t treason, then I don’t know what is."

Clearly, you don't.

that a scat sandwich, tasted like chicken.They'd eat it like a starving grizzly would.
It would then, instantaneously become their favorite sandwich !

TREASON as “the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance.” The US Constitution, in Article III, Section 3, addresses treason: “Treason against the United States, shall consist … giving them [enemies] Aid and Comfort.” Treason, as defined by the framers of the US Constitution, is “… aiding the enemies of the USA.” Russia, Iran, ect. are still enemies..and you seen his compromises with them... SM-3, oppositions of oil sanctions,, START. Explain how these are not treason.

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

But everything about Afghanistan sounds so much like Vietnam. Let's see, the negotiating table (which included the VietCong, if memory serves) had to be round, so that nobody was seen to be sitting at the head of the table (bleahbitty, bleahbitty, bleah bleah bleah...)

When will the American public recognize that they are suckered in by the same ole same ole --- decade after decade, unnecessary war after unnecessary war??

Well, I'm going to re-post this great article by commentator Mychal Massie. It wasn't available via search engine for a while. Massie apparently went in and corrected things. A good read at any point in this idiotic presidency:

http://mychal-massie.com/premium/why-i-do-not-like-the-obamas/

Simple, Free Image and File Hosting at MediaFire

At a point in every conflict in order for it to end both sides must come together to discuss terms of peace.

The same is true of the Taliban.

This is because as Clauswitz defined war as an extension of politics. So to see a political solution to end a war is reasonable and logical.

The alternative is total destruction of the enemy i.e. holocaust, or ethnic cleansing through other means i.e. combination of forced/limited breeding. Instances in history it has not only failed but the repercussion upon the political power inflicting it has most times led to the complete downfall of that power.

Without a political meeting and a mending of the fences such as this we'd still be involved in the French and Indian War (in honesty the actual first World War) today. In war there are winners and losers but both must agree to end hostilities at some point.

MikeyA

Can anyone forget that picture of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin shaking hands with Israel's once sworn enemy PLO leader Yassir Arafat as Bill Clinton looked on? It's hard to imagine more bitter enemies than those.
How many of those who criticize these prospective talks are driving cars with a Japanese name plate? Should we have never had peace talks with the Japanese after Pearl Harbor and nearly four years of bitter warfare?
As MikeyA stated, "...both sides must agree to end hostilities at some point." If the talks go nowhere, we can always go back to war.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.