Romney's Foreign Assets

This is a great example of why Mitt Romney must share his tax returns for the last ten years--not just the last five. Otherwise, Romney's withholding of those tax returns just makes him look more like a international con artist and less like a trustworthy presidential candidate.

Quoting from the HuffingtonPost article of August 20, 2012:

"While there is no evidence that his actions violated the law, abuse of the foreign tax credit has been a problem for the Internal Revenue Service. The agency has prosecuted a number of international fraud cases in the last few years involving such credits. And the size of Romney's claim in 2008 raises questions about the sources of his foreign income."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/20/mitt-romney-foreign-tax-credit_...

Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Seriously Sojourner is there any chance in hell you would vote for Romney? I think not. So what difference would it make to you personally to see his tax returns which are hundreds of pages long and probably above your understanding unless your'e a CPA. According to the Huff and Puff post "there is no evidence". If you aren't going to vote for the guy because he's rich, or white, or Republican, just don't vote for him.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Your one to talk. Slamming Obama on that podunk radio station you're on all the time because he is not rich, black and democrat. How in the hell do you know how long his tax return is or how complicated it is? You don't. You used to be a half decent radio talk show host but have turned into a poor mans version of turkey neck O'Rielly. Maybe if your lucky someday you will meet Romney and he will let you clean the gum off his shoe. What a suckup you've become. No wonder your wife left you.

I nearly fell over laughing at this idiotic statement. Maobama is a very very wealthy individual, while maybe not as rich as the Republicrat challenger, Mitt for brains Romney, He certainly ain't hurtin. And he damn sure don't "feel your pain", or even give a wet fart about your financial situation. "Still laughing"

The fruits of MY labor are not a social commodity.

Willard:

My, my you are one angry fellow! From your comments, you must listen to the "podunk radio station."

Here's a little logic that you may want to consider. Under Obama, this country has suffered through years of 8+% unemployment, a failed "stimulus" package that mainly served to reward Obama-supporting companies (many of which have subsequently gone out-of-business), and the first ever downgrade in the Country's debt rating. With all of that, you're concerned about Romney's tax returns? The word "clueless" comes to mind.

Galt and his revisionist history lesson for the fools who suffer from long term memory loss. The president has stopped the 700,000 a month job loss of the Bush depression. Actually if you look back at Obama's record its of job gains! Is it enough? No! But from where we were on the brink of financial catastrophe we have now stabilized no thanks to obstructionists Republicans. Then we have these unfunded Bush wars that the fool gave the wealthy a tax break dumping the load on Obama's feet. Obama had to eliminate the Al-Qaeda who caused these silly wars. Bush didn't seem to care as long as the military lobbyists were happy. The debt was down graded because of the malcontents in the Republican party. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_credit-rat...

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Wolfman:

One might think that when they are called a "revisionist" of history, it might be followed by facts refuting the information that was presented. Well, apparently that wouldn't be true with your posting.

Which one of the 3 facts that I stated (i.e. 8+% unemployment rate, failed stimulus, downgrading of the U.S. debt rating) isn't true?

I find I agree with myself too!

I play poker and have learned to look for people's "tells". Paul has many.

MikeyA

Uh she's right over there-------> your'e (sp) info is wrong

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

It's typical of people who don't have facts (or knowledge) to back-up their statements to make personal attacks (e.g. divorce, etc.). Somehow it makes them feel good.

What do you think Fred does everyday on his little show.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Says the guy who had to publicly apologize for making inaccurate personal attacks.

MikeyA

Where the Money Lives
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/08/investigating-mitt-romney-off...
For all Mitt Romney’s touting of his business record, when it comes to his own money the Republican nominee is remarkably shy about disclosing numbers and investments. Nicholas Shaxson delves into the murky world of offshore finance, revealing loopholes that allow the very wealthy to skirt tax laws, and investigating just how much of Romney’s fortune (with $30 million in Bain Capital funds in the Cayman Islands alone?) looks pretty strange for a presidential candidate.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

OweBaMao Bin Lying, is also RICH !?

Hmmm, I wonder what the difference is ?!

Mitt, worked for decades to create jobs, to earn his dough.
Obammy, wrote two ( 2 ? ) autobiographies ( a dog eater, bullying fat girls, doper, coke head, for President ? ) filled with lies, to steal his millions ?!

So, one wonders which lesson to teach their children ?!

Lie, like the Devil incarnate or, work your giggy off for years ?!

God, do all lying scum from the psychotic Left, get their madness from living a mental Hell ?!

Thought so...

Sorry about the divorce comment Fred, it was uncalled for. Just disappointed in how you have turned out.

Lets cut to the chase talk facts here and not sugarcoat anything.
1) The majority of right wingers hate Obama because FEAR that he is BLACK. All the other reasons they use are just bullshit because of reason number 2. Most right wingers poop their pants when in the presence of a black man. Can you say racism?
2) The pathetic condition of this country started and hit rock bottom under Bush.
3) Rightwringers try to come off as religious upright and moral people. However, they just hide there perversions better. (closet queers).
4) Repubics don't believe in abortion for any reason and want woman to have as many babies as they want. When the time comes to pay for all these "love childs" , the pubics want to cut all funding for these woman, complete contradiction. The rights moronic mentality. They want their cake and eat it to.
5) Most of the rightwingers who post on this message board and toledo talk are in the 50-60's age range. They live comfortably, have their little piece of the pie and don't want anyone messing with it. They will tell you they worked hard for everything they got and sing "I did it my way" while bathing. (once a week ). They know they have had help along the way but deny it. They want to try to be "yuppies" and associate themselves with the rich, the same people who ask them to clean the dog shit off their shoe. Hicks.
If a black man knocked on their door they would soil their depends.
6) Vote for a man that tied his dog to the top of his car during a trip. Yeah that is a guy I want to lead my country, woof, woof.

I'm not concerned with how you feel about how I turned out, my mom thinks I did just fine and that's good enough for me.

1- a bullshit reason not backed up with facts
2- it started way before Bush, you need to go all they way back to at least FDR when it was decided that the govt. knew better how to take care of you and your family than you did.
3- Again bullshit with no facts
4- there is no reason for govt spending on abortions, you want one, you pay for it or don't get pregnant. rape and incest- get perpetrator to pay for it or your church and family, not me
5- wow, just wow
6- you would rather I vote for a man who actually ate dog? (obama autobiography)

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

That's future Pres. Obama on the left (of course) and me on the right (duh) back in the day. As part of the choom club we would head out to a van at lunch and get high on great Hawaiian marijuana. He tried to do a little blow once in awhile but I never did. From "Dreams Of My Father" - would smoke “in a white classmate’s sparkling new van,” he would smoke “in the dorm room of some brother” and he would smoke “on the beach with a couple of Hawaiian kids.”

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Fred did you take plenty of munchies when you viewed the movie,"2016: Obama's America"? I think a fella of your background would need some Hawaiian enhancement to swallow that movie whole.

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

I haven't seen the movie, and have no plans for it in the future. I just look at the last three and a half years of the Obama debacle and vote accordingly. Berry Soetoro and I did enjoy the Hawaiin Gold back in the day though. Choom forever!!!!!

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Is this why you're a Ron Paul supporter?

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Well that's a start for sure. I also like his stand on the Fed, personal responsibility, liberty, protection of my freedoms, right to bear arms, own property without fear of eminent domain etc. etc. I realize that is tough for a union born and bred person to understand. Many are used to being told what to do, when to do it, how to do it, and who to vote for. It's a sad state of affairs for many of them now that they see what all that following has gotten them.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Then why do you support Romney?

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Is this like your charge that I got you banned from Toledo Talk? Because I don't remember saying I support Romney, but maybe the audio is in the same place the proof of my asking you to be banned is at. Well, whatever, when you find them post them okay?

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

So who do you support if not Obama? Come on Fred get your head out of that nickel bag. You now support Romney the one who wants to EXPAND spending on the military while cutting domestic spending. Good luck on that one! http://billmoyers.com/segment/inside-nuns-on-a-bus-on-a-mission-of-faith...

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

I clicked on that link. It didn't have anything to do with my question.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Unemployment above 8% for 43 months straight-an American Historical Record !
Gas above $3.55 for 3.5 years of Obozoism !
Personal incomes down 15% in 3.5 years of Obummerism !
Net worth of real Americans DOWN $21 TRILLION in 3.5 years of Fascism !
Home values down from their Historic highs when GW, was President !
Retirement plans DOWN TRILLIONS since ObaMao, was selected !
Losing two winnable Wars !

Yes indeed, be sure to crybaby about a radio station in the Dim destroyed berg called Toledo !

Yes , you too can be as stupid as the most vapid ignoramus who has ever posted scat on the computer !
Oh, the worst economic news has yet to hit moron !
Who will will you whine and blame then ?!

Don't respond....we all know who liars blame !

Hi Fred,
"'m not concerned with how you feel about how I turned out, my mom thinks I did just fine and that's good enough for me."

Just to clarify, I was/am talking about your radio program. Since Mr. Magoo should up on the scene you have turned into that pest Shaun Hannity. This had to be all planed right. If so I get it. Ratings. You used to be neutral and pleasant. I want the old Fred back.

It appears that many right wing conservatives on this board and on the radio, (Fred & Mr. Magoo), call themselves Libertarians because they are embarrassed how the right wing has turned out and can't defend a lot of their positions. FlipFops. Ex. Have as many kids as you want but not being concerned about who is going to pay for them. I'm an independent, not a Dumbcrat, Repubic or Lib. They are all party's whose main interest is acquiring wealth and power for their own kind. Anyone who thinks different (such as they are running to serve their country), is a fucking idiot. Excuse my french. Fear the black man!

If you are concerned with the care and feeding of illegitimate children then you should "adopt" one to care for, I was not there for the conception I don't expect to be there for the care and feeding unless it's voluntary.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Follow the money

Republican convention flooded with corporate money
http://grist.org/news/republican-convention-flooded-with-corporate-money/
Tip sheet: 2012 Republican National Convention
http://sunlightfoundation.com/press/releases/2012/08/24/tip-sheet-2012-r...

Statements made are the opinion of the writer who is exercising his first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and are generally permitted.

Hi Fred,
I'm not concerned about feeding illegitimate children. Children should be brought into this world only under the right circumstances, such as, have a mother and father with the parents being financially able to support the child in a proper manner. A drunken guy shooting a load in a woman in the back seat of a car does not meet this criteria, therefore
if this payload of lustfull seaman some how starts to develop into an embryo it should be terminated. As crass as this sounds it is reality . There should be procedure in place (abortion) to carry this out. What is cheaper, a woman having an abortion or paying welfare for a child the rest of their lives?
Libertarians are poor man Republicans
Fear the Black Man..

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.