What to see in D.C.

Tagged:  

Anything in particular I should try to see while in Washington D.C? I'm headed there for a weekend conference at a Westfield Marriot with some friends of mine and will have some down time between seminars on media control and agenda hiding. A room opened up for me when a Mr. Jones (prolly a fake name) had to cancel suddenly. Highlight of the weekend will be a straw poll for who we want as President this election. I think we may have made a mistake last time.

No votes yet

the hidden lair of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). Be advised though, they recently changed the secret handshake so if you haven't yet been shown, you'll need to check with your Bain-controlled corporate masters.

We need the Cincinnatti museaum!!!

This may seem like an odd request, but it's true. Case in point, please study this picture of the Cincinnatti Museaum Center. http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/family-vacations-cincinnati-museum-center.jpg Note the fountain, the art deco facade.

Does it or does it not look strikingly similar to.....THE HALL OF JUSTICE!http://www.myfreewallpapers.net/comics/pages/superfriends-hall-of-justice.shtml

Now, have you seen the ALEC headquarters? No! It's because the legion of doom was a mobile command center of evil. http://images.wikia.com/superman/images/9/98/Legion_of_Doom_Headquarters... That is why ALEC moves it's conferences.

Can the curator of the Cincinnatti museaum fly faster than a speeing bullet?

Is ALEC secretly run by Lex Luthor?

Does Aquaman have any powers that anyone cares about?

http://di1-1.shoppingshadow.com/images/pi/a6/fe/97/103922449-260x260-0-0... Why does the Flash have a motorcycle when he can run lightening fast?

Answers to this and more on the next adventure of the Super Friends!

MikeyA

The "Legion of Doom" was just a bunch of punks. Who wants to hang around a dank swamp all the time? Lex Luthor eventually wised up and put himself in an office tower (Lexcorp) in the middle of Metropolis, using a real organization for doing evil: A corporation.

Everyone knows that.

And

And he was elected President as well.

MikeyA

It has both Russian and American clandestine listening devices and tools used by the CIA and KGB. Items related to spying from the Civil War on.

You can easily spend the better part of a day in there.

"microdots, invisible ink, buttonhole cameras, submarine recording systems, bugs of all kinds, and ingenious disguise techniques developed by Hollywood for the CIA."

http://www.spymuseum.org/
800 F Street Northwest Washington, DC 20004

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

I liked the spy museaum but it was a bit pricey.

I'd highly recommend the National Museaum of Health and Medicine, where you can see the bullet that killed Abraham Lincoln!

MikeyA

I got the steps of the ALEC handshake the other day in my talking points e mail, so I'm cool there.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Visit the Pilgrim Observation Gallery at the National Cathedral..

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

It's been many years since I visited this place, but the place in DC that sent chills up my spine the most is the tiny, unassuming building tucked among more typical, large city buildings, that is Ford's Theater. You can see the place where Lincoln was shot. You can go across the street to the also tiny, unassuming building that was the boarding house where the wounded President was taken, and where he died. In the basement of Ford's Theater is a diorama of the last day of Lincoln's life and some personal artifacts.

The Spy Museum is great. But one really can't go wrong visiting any of the museums in the Smithsonian complex, and all of those impressive memorials! I find something emotionally moving in each one! And right across the Potomac from the Lincoln Memorial is Arlington National Cemetary. That's a "don't miss" place, too!

should be a priority !

Then, you can report that the opulent offices are identical to those of former dictators Gadhafi,Gbagbo,Kenyatta, Taylor, etc.
And, compare them to offices of the downtown businesses that could not survive in Toledo, that fled or died.

[ Those who make the rules have the best furnished offices, pay, retirement plans, heath plans,perks, etc...the citizens( subjects ) , be damned ! ]

Preferably while acting like a lost tourist.

There's a city full of walls you can post complaints at

Twila won't like that comment.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Actually I have a better one for you. Last year I visited the Fredrick Douglass home in Anacostia. My brother who lives in Fort Washington took me to the home. On our way out he made the comment, "I'd rather be caught with gasoline drawls in hell than be caught in Anacostia after dark." That was the funniest thing I had ever heard up to that point. I still laugh about it because my brother is a VietNam vet and ain't afraid of nothing. Anacostia must be the pits and Fred is an ass.

Anacostia must be the pits and Fred is an ass.

You are correct on both counts.

There's a city full of walls you can post complaints at

It's a shame an old woman like you can't control her language in a public forum. What a low class example to set for other African-American women. But I guess we should expect it considering the language used by black men in rap lyrics.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

One of the roughest debaters here or anywhere is this thin-skinned? Really?

I have complained about some of the language use on this site, but equating Purnhrt's language to that on some rap recordings? You are kidding? Right? And, in the context, the original meaning of a type of donkey seems more appropriate than what would be a most mild expletive on a rap recording.

Yes Dale, I'm kidding with her. Not suprising you didn't understand that.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

"It's a shame an old woman like you"..........Hmmmm.......I am proud to be my age. A lot of people don't make it to this age. So your placing emphasis on my age as being something negative is more of a reason for me to call you an ass. I seem to bring out the anger in you. I wonder why.....

the language used by black men in rap, I was talking to a young white man in Home Depot, who told me that Lil Wayne is a lyrical genius. I was absolutely floored.......a lyrical genius...go figure.....He is about as much of a lyrical genius as you are a academic or mental genius. Who doesn't know where to go in Washington, D.C.?

Yeah I can see just how brilliant you are tp. You didn't even realize that I wasn't going to D.C. and was poking fun at those that believe the Bilderbergs control everything and that I get my marching orders from some shadowy right wing organization. I've been to D.C. a number of times and know enough to stay away from Anacostia.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

GOD (Father of our Lord Jesus Christ) controls everything, owns the cattle on a thousand hills (see Psalms), etc.

And what is going to happen in the end to an evil world system in God's final judgment is covered very nicely in several chapters of Revelation (roughly chapters 16 through 20). You can poke fun at those who recognize evil in such organizations as the Bilderbergers all you want. It demonstrates only that you are woefully uninformed about the one worlders of all stripes.

Watching tv yesterdy, I was just a little shocked that Angelina J. is now a member of the self--aggrandizing "Council on Foreign Relations". And yet, upon reflection, it somehow fits that this self-important bunch of turd-heads admits people whose history includes wearing blood in a vial around their necks.

Sorry, but reading your defenses of the banksters is bad enough, considering the blatant damage they have done and are doing to the economy - but cheerleading, so to speak for the "boogers" - ya don't know what you are talking about. Evil is evil, and needs to be identified as such.

Using taxpayer dollars to attend this year. See last paragraph of article. Exactly - therein lies the problem, as many U.S. politicians also attend. Keeping the agenda secret whilst using taxpayer dollars. If the discussions are really actually important - then why can't taxpayers in all countries know what was discussed? These participants are fools, and worse... most of them are completely godless.

http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=20117

Any counter arguments, I will be ignoring - I am posting this for the lurkers, and those not acquainted with the "boogers" - which include David Rockefeller and war criminal Hank Kissinger. The "boogers" can be googled several different ways and much accurate info obtained that way. I suggest: The Bilderbergers are evil.

You should make the Bilderbergs produce their birth certificates!

MikeyA

Hidden agenda? Maybe to you, but I got my copy in the same manner in which I receive my talking points each morning, secret e mail address provided by the true owners of the internet. Were it not for the Illuminati and the Bilderbergers I would have no show to speak of. I can post this without fear because we know most will see it as joking instead of the truth. People are so easily mislead and become sheeple without even realizing it, Alex Jones is a perfect example. He pretends to protest our meetings as we tell him to while carrying out or plan of news distortion daily. Farmergirl is right when she tells you to read Revelations, but read only every fourth word to see the real message we have hidden there.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

it sounded reasonable enough to me. White people are probably warned to stay away from Anacostia when given their agenda. Therefore, I didn't know about Anacostia until mi hermano told me about the "gasoline drawls" cause they don't give that information to old black women, visiting the DC area.

What the hell are you talking about? Their agenda? Gasoline drawls?

MikeyA

stupid does. Agenda as in when you go on a tour of a city, you are given an agenda for the day such as: Visit the Washington Monument, enjoy the blah, blah blah. Take the monorail to the monument or the blue line...etc.....WARNING: Do not go to Anacostia!

Your paranoia is peeking through, I wasn't talking about a hidden agenda or any agenda as such......smh,,...

Mikey, you are just out of it!

It's called context. I guess my mistake was assuming you'd think in context but no it's purnhrt in her own little purnhrt world again where she knows what she knows despite facts and actual reality.

No one spoke of a tour at any point until you did just now. Fred is there for a conference and has "free time" he is not there on a tour of the city hence he would not be given an "agenda" (most people call it an itinerary).

Secondly you spoke of gasoline drawls which you still haven't explained. I had to go search it. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100101175952AAwsakg the response is priceless in the link "An incredibly stupid and primitive phrase." which would explain why I didn't know it and you did.

"Your paranoia is peeking through, I wasn't talking about a hidden agenda or any agenda as such......smh,,...

Mikey, you are just out of it!" Did I or did I not ask "What the hell are you talking about?" Your entire post was confusing because it lacked... wait for it... CONTEXT!

So please show me where I alluded to a "hidden agenda" or anything of paranoia? I believe you're getting me confused with farmergal. I know we're both white and thus look alike to you.

Once again a post by purnhrt can safely qualify for the phrase: Epic Fail. It must be a day that ends in Y.

MikeyA

Now that you've vented your anger, here's something that you might be interested to know:

"Fred is there for a conference"

Except he isn't. Reread what he wrote. He's just being an ass. Are Fred and I the only ones on this post that understood that he wasn't really going to a conference in DC?

"Once again a post by purnhrt can safely qualify for the phrase: Epic Fail."

In what context?

There's a city full of walls you can post complaints at

No I got that HB. It's a joke about the Bilderbergs, I posted what I did about the conference to show the context of the thread.

But she posted the agenda in the context of a tour, which no one mentioned and it was out of place. I responded with questions and knowing the conspiracy theorists like FG who talk about "their agenda" but that what purnhrt wrote didn't fit. Likewise the gasoline comment needed definition. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.

"In what context?" In the context that she calls me stupid and paranoid where she speaks on things, i.e. tours, without a frame of reference on them and assumes we know what she's talking about. This is par for the course with purnhrt. Much of what she posts can be taken two ways.

Example: "Mikey you are just out of it." Now I can take this two ways. One, I am not following what she's writing, which is true and the reason why I posted to her initially, of course I don't get the courtesy of her answering questions so I must search them myself and assume the commonly accepted definition is what she means which is a stretch with her. Or two, she is furthering her comment on my "paranoia" which I think I had previously shown in this thread I do not have and in turn insulting me while reserving the other way as a fall back if I respond in kind.

Again this behavior is her modus operandi. As she stated to me when she accused me of attacking her son saying she KNOWS what happened. Of course I then provided links and quotes to show her wrong to which she doesn't apologize or respond to. Why doesn't she? Because she KNOWS. She's in her own little reality where facts do not matter because that's not "her truth". Now, will she admit I am not paranoid based upon my actual statements here? Nope. Because she KNOWS I am despite the facts showing it to be untrue. Likewise she's stated she is not sure that I am in the military. To which I've provided posters here who could verify it, does she verify it? Nope, because she keeps plausible (by her standards) deniability so she can keep lobing attacks.

Please defend her if you like but I can provide quotes and linkes to this behavior. It's well documented here.

MikeyA

"In what context?" In the context that she calls me stupid and paranoid where she speaks on things, i.e. tours, without a frame of reference on them and assumes we know what she's talking about. This is par for the course with purnhrt. Much of what she posts can be taken two ways.

Example: "Mikey you are just out of it." Now I can take this two ways. One, I am not following what she's writing, which is true and the reason why I posted to her initially, of course I don't get the courtesy of her answering questions so I must search them myself and assume the commonly accepted definition is what she means which is a stretch with her. Or two, she is furthering her comment on my "paranoia" which I think I had previously shown in this thread I do not have and in turn insulting me while reserving the other way as a fall back if I respond in kind.

Again this behavior is her modus operandi. As she stated to me when she accused me of attacking her son saying she KNOWS what happened. Of course I then provided links and quotes to show her wrong to which she doesn't apologize or respond to. Why doesn't she? Because she KNOWS. She's in her own little reality where facts do not matter because that's not "her truth". Now, will she admit I am not paranoid based upon my actual statements here? Nope. Because she KNOWS I am despite the facts showing it to be untrue. Likewise she's stated she is not sure that I am in the military. To which I've provided posters here who could verify it, does she verify it? Nope, because she keeps plausible (by her standards) deniability so she can keep lobing attacks.

Please defend her if you like but I can provide quotes and linkes to this behavior. It's well documented here.

I was being facetious. No need to give a dissertation.

There's a city full of walls you can post complaints at

stupid is as ... see any post by purnhrt.

MikeyA

How many sandwich shops did Fred visit?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.