Why? Why Why

Obama made a number of things during the campaign.

Why are we still in Afghanistan ?

Why is unemployment above 8 %

Why is he proposing taxing whats left of the middle class?

Why is there no health care yet?

Are all these Bush's fault?

No votes yet

Why? It's because Obama is a unrepentant liar, and he lied to a huge audience of fools known as "Democrat voters". When a blatant liar finds a ready audience for his lies, can you really say that there are any real victims there?

What's even sillier, is that most of those Democrat morons will vote for that disgusting liar in Nov 2012. The nation deserves what it gets. Democrats had every chance to prove they could govern, after the Republicans proved they couldn't. They failed ... and they just don't care, since all they really care about is having legislative and executive power for enough of a time to enact one of their huge Communist programs (ref. Obamacare, i.e. the "health-care reform bill").

While I’ve pretty much been avoiding the right wing freak show that is SB these day, but I’ll take some time educate you Tom and GZ.
- Obama never proposed withdrawing from Afghanistan. He campaigned on sending more troops there and he followed through.
- Why is unemployment above 8 %? Because the stimulus last wasn’t big enough and a third of it was tax cuts. I guess tax cuts don't create jobs - good to know.
- Why is he proposing taxing what’s left of the middle class? He isn’t.
- Why is there no health care yet? Because conservatives are douchebags (Blue Dogs and Republicans) and would let real health care reform (single payer or public option) go through.
GZ – There is a lot to dislike about Obama’s health care plan, but it is hardly a “communist” plan. It’s nearly the exact same plan as Massachusetts’ Romneycare or the same that Nixon proposed in the early 70’ or that Dole and Hatch proposed in 90’s. Only a few short decades ago, Obama would have been a Republican.

It's getting real old hearing you talk, with a democrat in the oval office with a democrat majority in both houses and still blaming their ineffectiveness on the republicans... Ive been hearing the same tripe right here in Toledo with a democrat run/union puppet regime in charge for as long as anyone can remember, but the conservatives are the ones painted as the reason for all the problems.

it's just fucking boring and old.

Billy,I guess by this point I really shouldn't be surprised that you have no clue how the Senate works. It takes 60 votes to get anything passed in the Senate these days, which Democrats don't have and unlike the Republicans, the Democrats think for themselves and don't always vote in a single block.

you addressed five points and only one of them even mentioned 'Republicans' in a negative light...

So the republicans are to blame for lack of Democrat unity. Thanks. Clears up a lot.

Also - can you provide a date that we can set where we can start blaming this administration for not getting things done? I mean, since ried and pelosi took over in 2007 (when unemployment was at 4.5%) it's been three years, and I was just wondering if there's a date when that 'buck stops here' business takes effect...

If you can toss us out a date, that'd be much appreciated.

four years. If there's no obvious improvement, no obvious trending downward in the unemployment numbers, he'll be gone. It's that simple. It's all about people working or not working.

Correct – that’s why it’s imperative for Republicans to do everything in their power to make sure unemployment stays high.

When the democrats took control of congress in 2006 unemployment was at 4.6%...

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

They must be taking a chapter from the Democrat playbook, because that sure looks like what the dems have been doing since they stepped up to the plate 3 years ago.

Look at this graph from the US Department of Labor Statistics. Notice when unemployment started ticking upward? January of 2008. What happened in January of 2008? Barak Obama took office.

 

The little boy in the Whitehouse has screwed over America since day one and you still support him.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

Please provide cause and effect?

Unemployment went up because the housing bubble burst, the bubble that was inflated at a record pace when Bush and Republicans controlled everything. What you are witnessing today is the logical conclusion of Republican control, deregulation and corporations owning Washington (Republicans and Democrats.)

Democrats took back congress in 2006 because the economic house of cards that the Republicans built was being to crumble and everyone knew it. Further implosion of the of the economy lead to bigger Democratic gains in 2008. The only game plan the Republicans have is to make sure that nothing get’s fixed, the economy doesn’t improve and unemployment stays high so they can get back into power.

Sadly, Republicans have no plan for governing however. All they want to do is fight. They can further cut taxes from their near record low and further balloon the deficit in the process (funny how “deficits don’t matter” when it means cutting taxes), but that’s it, no other ideas.

Your statement "Unemployment went up because the housing bubble burst"

What actually happened:
No, according to the graph put out by the U.S Department of Labor Statistics, unemployment started going up when Obama won the Democratic nomination. It started going up at a faster pace when Obama and Democrats won the November election, and it started it's sharpest climb when Obama took office in January of 2009.
Because business knows that Democrats are not good for the economy.
And, if everyone knew the " house of cards that the Republicans built was being to crumble" in 2008, why didn't your heros in the Democrat controlled Congress do anything about it in the two years they had before Barry was elected? They had majority control of Congress since 2006. They had 2 years to stop this housing bubble.
In fact, Democrats BLOCKED s190, the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, submitted by McCain.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-190
1/26/2005--Introduced.
Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005
- Amends the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 to establish: (1) in lieu of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), an independent Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Agency which shall have authority over the Federal Home Loan Bank Finance Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac); and (2) the Federal Housing Enterprise Board. Sets forth operating, administrative, and regulatory provisions of the Agency, including provisions respecting: (1) assessment authority; (2) authority to limit nonmission-related assets; (3) minimum and critical capital levels; (4) risk-based capital test; (5) capital classifications and undercapitalized enterprises; (6) enforcement actions and penalties; (7) golden parachutes; and (8) reporting. Amends the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to establish the Federal Home Loan Bank Finance Corporation. Transfers the functions of the Office of Finance of the Federal Home Loan Banks to such Corporation. Excludes the Federal Home Loan Banks from certain securities reporting requirements. Abolishes the Federal Housing Finance Board."

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

Wow – you’re clueless, thanks for reminding me why I keep leaving Swamp Bubble. You related two time lines, without any evidence of why one event caused the other. I can easy say with accuracy that the more churches a city has the more rapes and murders it has. That’s a fact… of course the two things are in no way related, but they do correlate for other reasons.

The Republicans had over 10 years to fix the housing bubble and did nothing. How did Democrats kill “The Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005”? REPUBLICANS controlled the Senate in 2005!

As for economy doing better under Republicans? I call BS.

http://currencythoughts.com/2008/08/19/how-the-us-economy-performed-unde...

% Per Annum Democrat Republican Bush43
GDP Growth 4.1% 2.9% 2.2%
Employment 2.9% 1.7% 0.5%
CPI 4.0% 5.1% 3.0%
DJIA 8.1% 6.5% 0.9%
Dollar +0.8% -3.6% -5.9%

Bush tried to get a handle on the housing "bubble" as early as 2003....Democrats scoffed...

Freddie and fannie DELISTED from NY stock exchange:

Fannie, Freddie Delisting Signals Firms Have No Value

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100616-712880.html

Once again....when the democrats took control of congress in 2006...unemployment was at 4.6%

http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/03/news/economy/jobs_october/index.htm

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

Which party controlled congress and the whitehouse in 2003?

Ah..the video hit home I see....

the GOP held a slim majority in 2003...

Democrats and RINO's blocked reform.

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/09/18/ny-times-sept-2003-bush-pr...

And I would remind you...that democrats NOW have control...and are STILL blocking it...

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64A5ZJ20100511

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

Your response to that video is a tap dance? Pitiful. I would think that a well versed Marxist would be able to come up with a better propaganda piece than that.

'What happened in January of 2008? Barak Obama took office'.

Obama wasn't even elected until Nov. of '08; took office '09.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day...

Unemployment by month beginning January 2008
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 5.0 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.8 6.1 6.2 6.6 6.9 7.4
2009 7.7 8.2 8.6 8.9 9.4 9.5 9.4 9.7 9.8 10.1 10.0 10.0
2010 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.9 9.7 9.5
Source: The United States Department of Labor website
http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&gr...

April 2008 Democratic National Convention - Obama is nominated - Unemployment hits 8.9% and continues climing
November 2008 Obama is elected - Unemployment is at 6.9% and starts climbing again
January 2009 - Unemployment hits 7.7% on it's way to above 10% Obama plays golf.
January 2010 - Unemployment is at 9.7% and stays steady through this year. Obama goes on vacation and plays golf.

Bottom line: I mistakenly put 2008 instead of 2009 in my posts. At NO TIME SINCE HIS ELECTION has the unemployment numbers for Barry Obama gone below GW Bushs WORST unemployment numbers. Thanks to McScabby for pointing that out.

My apologies McScabby. You were right. 2008, the last year of Bush, was MUCH BETTER THAN EVERY MONTH SINCE BARRY SOTERO OBAMA WAS ELECTED.
What a pathetic loser of a President you morons elected. And even more pathetic is the Libtards like McScabby who think this empty suit socislist little boy is worth his weight in horse manure.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

Well, Libsie, by many if not most accounts, the economy is improving, not totally across the board, but it is getting better.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37893814/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6584V720100609

http://www.chainstoreage.com/story.aspx?id=140979&menuid=443

Employment numbers will lag behind ithe improvement and Republicans will likely benefit from still-high unemployment figures in Nov. congressional races, but every time you squeal about 'Marxist' this and 'Socialist' that, know that the vast majority of Americans don't buy into your extreme right-wing tripe. You and your ilk are fringe players representing a fringe political viewpoint and handy tools for the mainstream Republicans that would reap the rewards from Obama not getting a second term.

No Mcnasty...the ecomony is sucking hind titty...and will be for quite a while:

Obama's Chief Economist Admits Jobs Claim Pulled Out of Thin Air:

http://www.fiscalaccountability.org/index.php?content=719gates#

Economic Recovery Showing New Signs of Losing Steam:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/38258512

Gibbs....unemployment will be the same three months from now:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/19/white_house_no_answer_...

This is the new normal under obama and the democrats in congress....9+% unemployment....vs 4.6% when the dems took control of congress in 2006.

If any of you think Obama gives a flying crap about your job....you are deluded...

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

where did I 'apologize' for Obama?

I said he had 'a term'...four years...to get unemployment headed in the right direction. Either it happens or it doesn't.

Raising taxes by letting the BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE in January, in the middle of a recession, is the worst thing Democrats can do.

Correction, renewing the "Bush tax cuts for the rich" which are set to expire in January would be the worst thing two-faced Libtards can do.

The Democrat controlled House and Senate, along with the Democrat President HAVE TO LET THE "BUSH TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH" expire. Otherwise the ignorant Democrat voters like McScabby will see what lying, douche-bag hypocrites the Democratic Party and Socialist Libtards are.
I SAY RAISE TAXES IN THE MIDDLE OF A RECESSION! IT CAN ONLY HELP!

Again, McScabby, the only reason I respond to your mindless DNC supplied and scripted talking points is that it is so easy to make fun of you.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

So if 59 Democrats votes for something and 40 Republicans and 1 Democrat votes against it, then it’s the Democrats fault for not getting something done?

Democrats had a supermajority for the first year of Obama's term....

They could have passed anything they wanted....the fight was amongst democrats themselves...

And all they need to pass anything they want now is a couple of RINO moderates.....oh like they just did with the financial overhaul ...(power grab)

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

I can’t tell sometimes, whether you’re just Ignorant of the facts or just an outright liar. What I believe you were trying to say with your creative use of English spelling (forst yeay) was that Obama had a super majority for the “first year” of his Presidency.

Again, facts escape you as always because it’s not true. Obama became President on January 20th 2008. At that time Democrats only had 58 members. It wasn’t till Arlen Specter switched parties on April 28th and Al Franken was confirmed on June 30th. And again – Democrats don’t all vote with a single mind and it takes years to sometimes pass legislation, not months.

ZOMG!!!! a typo!!!! ...already corrected it...

Dont blame me for your sheer ignorance....the liberals CROWED about their "super majority"...they were quite proud of it...

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2009/04/the-democratic-super...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=6024813&page=1

You guys love to cite comedy central and the daily show...you'll love this:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-30-2009/democratic-super...

We all KNOW the socialists voted with the dems....

You can play history revision all you want, But that dog wont hunt son...

The dems had the votes....that's a FACT.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

And Republicans had the votes to "fix" Fanny and Freddy back in 2003 and 2005 and didn't...

Actually the dems blocked it from coming out of committee both back then...and as little as 5 months ago...

http://www.openmarket.org/2010/05/12/democrats-block-reform-of-corrupt-m...

In a party-line, 56-to-43 vote yesterday, Senate Democrats blocked any reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the corrupt, government-backed mortgage giants that even administration officials admit were at the “core” of “what went wrong” in the financial crisis.

President Obama received $125,000 in contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives as a senator, second only to the corrupt Senator Chris Dodd, who is retiring this year over financial improprieties (such as his real estate gift from a lobbyist and “sweetheart mortgage from Countrywide Financial“), yet is the chief drafter of the financial “reform” legislation expected to pass the Senate by next week.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

read this crap....
Submitted by SensorG on Sun, 2010-07-18 08:36.
While I’ve pretty much been avoiding the right wing freak show that is SB these day, but I’ll take some time educate you Tom and GZ.
- Obama never proposed withdrawing from Afghanistan. He campaigned on sending more troops there and he followed through.
- Why is unemployment above 8 %? Because the stimulus last wasn’t big enough and a third of it was tax cuts. I guess tax cuts don't create jobs - good to know.
- Why is he proposing taxing what’s left of the middle class? He isn’t.
- Why is there no health care yet? Because conservatives are douchebags (Blue Dogs and Republicans) and would let real health care reform (single payer or public option) go through.
GZ – There is a lot to dislike about Obama’s health care plan, but it is hardly a “communist” plan. It’s nearly the exact same plan as Massachusetts’ Romneycare or the same that Nixon proposed in the early 70’ or that Dole and Hatch proposed in 90’s. Only a few short decades ago, Obama would have been a Republican.

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

Where am I wrong?

keeping it real, McC and Sg. You have a lot of patience.

Twila, are you a proponent of liberation theology?

Not Again!
First of all you don't know me well enough to cal me Twila. Second of all liberation theology is not the topic.

However I will answer: According to Wikipedia liberation theology was a movement that began with the catholic church in the 50- 60's. Being as I was a catholic at the time (once a catholic, always a catholic-so they say). I probably could find a case for liberation theology. I'm not sure if you are getting liberation theology mixed up with black liberation theology, which are two different movements in the religious community. I would definately say that I believe in in black liberation theology.

Does that help you out?

Very good thanks, the Marxist version that preaches white people are evil, and as taught by the president's preacher of 20 years. Sorry, I was off topic.

"I would definately say that I believe in in black liberation theology"

My dear twila...you have just admitted that you are a racist....but that is the first step to recovery...so I will see it in a positive light...as a catholic...

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

Here is another example of an outed hater of white people, The video is of a black lady in the obama admin. bragging to an NAACP meeting about how she screwed a white farmer and caused him to lose his farm.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/19/clip-shows-usda-official-admi...

Amazingly CNN even picked up on this story. They better watch out, obama will crucify them for presenting balanced coverage.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/20/agriculture.employee.naacp/index....

Yes Black Liberation Theology, all rich white people must release all their goods, give reparations to Black Americans, and according to some you can't be saved or be a Christian until you do so. Wow what a concept...

"DTOM" {1776} " We The People" {1791}

I ask these questions:

1) What group stole a whole country from native people and claim they discovered it?

2) What group of people stole and enslaved millions of people from other lands to do all their work for them?

3) What group of people infested people with infectious diseases and other goodies to kill the native people because they had the audacity to defend themselves?

4) What group of people routinely put people unlike themselves through cruel and unusual treatment - torture, lynchings, beheadings, live incineration?

5) What group of people tried to murder an entire race so they could steal their wealth?

Inquiring minds would like to know.

1) What group stole a whole country from native people and claim they discovered it?

The latinos called Spaniards...namely Cortez...Funded by the king and queen of SPAIN.

http://library.thinkquest.org/J002678F/cortez.htm

2) What group of people stole and enslaved millions of people from other lands to do all their work for them?

The Arabs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade

3) What group of people infested people with infectious diseases and other goodies to kill the native people because they had the audacity to defend themselves?

Again...the spaniards:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_indigenous_peoples_of...

4) What group of people routinely put people unlike themselves through cruel and unusual treatment - torture, lynchings, beheadings, live incineration?

Again..the Arabs under the banner of Islam:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_slavery

5) What group of people tried to murder an entire race so they could steal their wealth?

National socialists:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust

And the spaniards:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_colonization_of_the_Americas

and the islamic Arabs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_wars_in_Europe

But I will assume those arent the answers you were fishing for....

so it must be "whitey"...

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

do not confuse this issue with facts.

You said it before I could, and you did a good job with the presentation. I was reading along and trying to decide if I had the time and energy to put together an appropriate reply - and there it was. A hoist of the old bourbon glass to you, sir.

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

Thanks.

*hat tip*

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

I'd just like to point out the Spaniards are white and Ottomans (Turks) aren't Arabs...I'm sure they "all look the same to you" though...

Spaniards are white?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_people

The ottoman empire wasnt islamic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire

BTW you you look at the map of the ottoman empire...you'll see it clearly encompasses the entire modern middle east including meccha and pershia...clearly arabic lands...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OttomanEmpireIn1683.png

Maybe next you'll claim the turks and arabs are white too?

Any one who isnt black...must be white...right?

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

There are a lot of races other than black and white or Arab for that matter.

As for 'turks and arabs are white too?' I guess it is how you want to define white, if you mean Caucasian then Turks are white and arabs are arabs. You realy should pick up a history book once in a while.

Have you ever been to Spain? They are white/Caucasian , as a matter of fact I met plenty of blond hair/blue eyed people there. Spain isn't any else white that any other European country.

LMAO!!!!!!

The blond haired blue eyed blood is NORDIC you ignorant toad...

Yeah I know the race baiters what to pretend the europe was a hegemony...but that is far from the truth....

Spain was over here bootstomping around long before anyone else...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_colonization_of_the_Americas

In fact...the only "white guy" who may have set foot here before the spaniards Leif Ericson

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Ericson

Yeah...he was WHITE....as a ghost....

The people who killed and raped and spread decease where the HISPANICS!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hispanic

The "white guys" where late to the scene...

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

Again - how much time have you spent in Spain? Are you saying there are no blonde hair/blue eyed people in Spain?

"Hispanic" is a term we tradionally use to refer to people from Centeral and South America.

Here is a pic of the Nation Spanish Soccer team - what "color" are they?

LMAO....you cant just let it go can you..."They're white...they're white you scream!!!!"

From the wiki link I posted...which you clearly didnt bother to READ:

Hispanic (Spanish: hispano, hispánico) is a term that originally denoted a relationship to the ancient Hispania (geographically coinciding with the Iberian Peninsula). During the modern era, it sometimes takes on a more limited meaning, relating to the contemporary nation of Spain.

Still more recently, primarily in the United States, the term has also (or alternatively) been used to denote the culture and people of countries formerly ruled by the Spanish Empire, usually with a majority of the population speaking the Spanish language. Collectively known as Hispanic America, this definition includes Mexico, the majority of the Central and South American countries, and most of the Greater Antilles. The nations formerly pertaining to the Spanish East Indies are sometimes loosely included in this definition, as their cultures have some Spanish or Latin American elements

They're spaniards!!! I reply....after a few hundre years they can be of any color...

In the 1400's...they werent "white" anymore than an american indian was "white"...

Hell..by your defintion....these native americans are "white" too:

http://www.clevelandseniors.com/family/powwow-2007.htm

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

....but Ottoman turks weren't arabic by-and-large, even though for part of their rule they encompassed much of the modern middle east, and parts of Christian Europe, so by that definition you could call them white christians as well. Turks are just that - turks. There are many arabic people there, as well as white.

Actually, every race on this planet has committed all these acts, but I was fishing to see what answers guilt and anger would produce.

Well..I hope you werent disappointed...

*snicker*

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

I wasn't disappointed at all. I already knew what responses I'd get. We have a long way to go as a society, don't we.

NT

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

McScabby is still sucking up to Obama and his Democratic leaders because he thinks that government created jobs somehow.

Yet more news today proves he is wrong as Democrats most always are. But at least the unemployment rate is going down!

"WASHINGTON – The unemployment rate fell in most states in June, mainly because more people gave up searching for work and were no longer counted.

Fewer states saw job increases, the latest evidence that the economic recovery is slowing."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100720/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/us_state_unemployment

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

facinated me. "whitey" Where did it have it's origin? And the term "get whitey." Where did that come from? I have never used it nor have any of the people that I know. Hmmmm.

I see it a lot on this site since Barack Obama became President Barack Obama!

Okay, I'll bite.

Why are we still in Afghanistan ?

Literally, because we haven't left yet. Just like the invasion of Iraq, the war in Afghanistan was ill conceived from the very beginning. Victory conditions were never established and Congress signed a blank cheque for War Expenses. King George II invaded and The Anointed One shows no signs of advancing to the rear. Victory conditions still have not been codified. Instead, the United States continues to expand militarily, constructing and populating new military bases throughout the world.

Why is unemployment above 8 %

Again, literally because there are no jobs. 8% is being generous and it doesn't account for pockets of high unemployment, such as Detroit and parts of Wisconsin. One small city in Wisconsin has a 22% unemployment rate - GM closed a plant and the rest followed. Part of this is due to outsourcing of jobs to overseas locations, for which we can thank past administrations - Slick Willie, to be precise. The Anointed One could work to bring those jobs back and has not.

Why is he proposing taxing whats left of the middle class?

Because The Anointed One knows that the Federal government needs more money if it is to continue to grow. Like any other organism (orgasm?) the Federal government needs food (money) and will continue to expand into all available real estate. It will also protect itself, meaning more Federal law and more regulation of non-supportive similar organisms. The Federal government will also continue to make its supporters more dependent upon the Federal government for their own 'food'.

Cardinal rule: When it comes to money, more is always better. Always. No exceptions.
Cardinal rule: I (the government) am more important than you.
Cardinal rule: I (the government) am smarter than you. For every dollar I take from you, I will decide how that dollar is best spent and how much of that dollar you, the taxpayer, will get back.

Why is there no health care yet?

There is health care. There is plenty of health care, and it's available all over the place. Check with any hospital and find out how much free health care the hospital gives away, and of that amount how much the government covers. If you mean why isn't there any free health care, I can't help you. I've never been able to find any either, and I've looked all over.

Before The Anointed One was elected, Himself described His health care plan which was nothing more than forcing everyone to buy health insurance. Somehow, the voters who elected The Anointed One saw nothing wrong with that. And so, you see, in a few years everyone will be forced to buy health insurance, and the insurance companies will pay for everyone's health care, thus allowing the government to cut costs.

Are all these Bush's fault?

Nope. There's plenty of misery to go around. King George II, aided and abetted by the United States House and the United States Senate and working in conjunction with the United States Supreme Court did mercilessly and maliciously fuck up the economy so completely that a recovery will likely not be seen in the next three generations. Both Moonbats and the Stupid Party can share the blame; both complied with King George II's demands for war funds, both have supported war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and both have done so with enthusiasm.

The Anointed One inherited an economic train wreck the severity of which has not been seen since the Great Depression. The Anointed One knew this before he ran for office, and by running he accepted responsibility for starting a recovery. So far, The Anointed One has failed miserably and completely to address a comprehensive recovery program.

My greatest disappointment in The Anointed One is in Himself's failure to restore the civil rights usurped by many previous administrations under the guise of national security and patriotism. Restoring our civil rights is something The Anointed One could have achieved. Instead, The Anointed One hasn't even admitted there might be a problem.

Mad Jack
Mad Jack's Shack

God sent the Buffalo Soldiers to rescue Teddy Roosevelt on San Juan Hill. It took a little time.

God sent Obama to rescue GWB. It will take some time.

Remember GWB had an eight year head start.

Taliban buying children for suicide bombers
"Pakistan's top Taliban leader, Baitullah Mehsud, is buying children as young as 7 to serve as suicide bombers in the growing spate of attacks against Pakistani, Afghan and U.S. targets, U.S. Defense Department and Pakistani officials say. "

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/02/taliban-buying-children-...

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

Yes it does, thought the bible says it ok.

Exodus 21:1-4 "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself."

Deuteronomy 15:12-18 "And if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee.And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty: Thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy winepress: of that wherewith the Lord thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him."

Exodus 21:7 "And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do."

Deuteronomy 20:14 "But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself"

The Taliban is buying children for suicide bombers TODAY.

Can you please show me the link where Christians are buying children for suicide bombers TODAY?

Maybe you believe the bible. Good for you. I personally do not. Since you quote the bible, does that mean you are trying to buy children and justifying your actions because a book written 2000 years ago says it is OK? Why are you buying children? For suicide bombers like your Taliban heros?

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

double post.

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a
socialist.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.