Our view on defense earmarks: Campaign cash for contracts casts Congress in a bad light

USA Today's stance on the PMA scandal:
===
When it came out last month that seven members of a key House committee were under scrutiny by ethics investigators, House leaders were outraged.

Not about the clear implication of the inquiry — that defense contracts are for sale. The leaders were upset about the accidental leak that allowed the information to come out publicly.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2009/11/debate-on-defense-earmarks-our-vi...

No votes yet