Obvious that the VP candidate is a criminal.

From the Washington Times:

Biden routes campaign cash to family, their firms
Discloses $2 million in business arrangements
Jim McElhatton (Contact)
Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Democratic vice-presidential candidate Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. has paid more than $2 million in campaign cash to his family members, their businesses and employers over the years, a practice that watchdogs criticize as rife with potential conflicts of interest.

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s son, Hunter Biden, was at a campaign stop with his father in December. The candidate's sister, Valerie Biden Owens, is his longtime campaign manager.

The money largely flowed from the coffers of Mr. Biden's failed presidential campaign during the past two years to a company that employs his sister and longtime campaign manager, Valerie Biden Owens, according to campaign disclosure filings.

The senator from Delaware also directed campaign legal work to a Washington lobbying and law firm founded by his son R. Hunter Biden, the disclosures show.

Putting family members and their companies on the political payroll is legal if the work is legitimate and charged at market rates, according to the Federal Election Commission. Still, public watchdog groups have long criticized such arrangements. "


Yet the Lemmingcrats who are trying to tear apart Sara Palin somehow missed this CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.

No votes yet

This guy should have the book thrown at him the same way Barney Frank did when his gay friend ran a sex club in the basement, and the same way Ted Kennedy did when he killed Mary Jo Kopechne.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

you really seem to enjoy mentioning that gay-sex-club -in-the-basement thing. Haven't you copy-and-pasted that like six times? Hmmm.......


"But the legal dispute has offered inside glimpses of the deals, including revelations that a corporate counsel working for the Hunter Biden-led venture was awaiting sentencing on a federal money-laundering charge, and allegations of drug abuse by one hedge fund's senior officers and prior owners."

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a

From the Washington Post:

"A son and a brother of Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) are accused in two lawsuits of defrauding a former business partner and an investor of millions of dollars in a hedge fund deal that went sour, court records show.

The Democratic vice presidential candidate's son Hunter, 38, and brother James, 59, assert instead that their former partner defrauded them by misrepresenting his experience in the hedge fund industry and recommending that they hire a lawyer with felony convictions. "


So again I ask the Lemmingcrats.
If it is OK to talk about Sara Palins pregnant daughter and handicapped son, WHERE is the major media articles and news stories about Hunter Biden, Joe Bidens son?

Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a

You just cited two articles from mainstream media, one of which is from that supposedly liberal bastion of subversive thought, The Washington Post. This story is not being ignored by the mainstream media.

What you really question is why more people do not get up in arms, and that owes more to weariness than some conspiracy to hide truth. Most folks - beyond rabid partisans - have reached the point of overload with scandal-mongering, and are looking forward to the election so that there is a respite from the political mudslinging.


When I read the subject line, I assumed you were talking about somebody actually finding that a vice-presidential candidate violated the law and the media mostly ignoring it. Instead you posted a story where watchdogs were concerned, but there are no allegations of actually violating the law. That's a little bit of a stretch, especially when the Republican Vice-Presidential candidate has been found to violate the law. When a supposed reformer violates ethics law, shouldn't it be something that the media is concerned about?

Is LibsCanBlowMe actually Lisa Renee, but without the false pretense of objectivity?

now that is a good question.

"He went on to receive his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law in 1968,[11] where by his own description he underperformed.[12][13] During his first year there, he was accused of having plagiarized 5 of 15 pages of a law review article. Biden said it was inadvertent due to his not knowing the proper rules of citation, and he was permitted to retake the course after receiving a grade of F, which was subsequently dropped from his record.[13] He was admitted to the Delaware Bar in 1969.[11]"

"By August 1987, Biden's campaign, whose messaging was confused due to staff rivalries,[79] had begun to lag behind those of Michael Dukakis and Richard Gephardt,[76] although he had still raised more funds than all candidates but Dukakis, and was seeing an upturn in Iowa polls.[80][77] In September 1987, the campaign ran into trouble when he was accused of plagiarizing a speech by Neil Kinnock, then-leader of the British Labour Party.[81] Kinnock’s speech included the lines:

"Why am I the first Kinnock in a thousand generations to be able to get to university? [Then pointing to his wife in the audience] Why is Glenys the first woman in her family in a thousand generations to be able to get to university? Was it because all our predecessors were thick?"

While Biden’s speech included the lines:

"I started thinking as I was coming over here, why is it that Joe Biden is the first in his family ever to go to a university? [Then pointing to his wife in the audience] Why is it that my wife who is sitting out there in the audience is the first in her family to ever go to college? Is it because our fathers and mothers were not bright? Is it because I'm the first Biden in a thousand generations to get a college and a graduate degree that I was smarter than the rest?""


Don't blame me,
I didn't vote for a

because if it does not have Palin or Joe the Plumber in it, it is not newsworthy. Let's move on to Sarah Palin's wardrobe. That is what is important.

In less than one week, we will find out who will be our Commander in Chief for the next four years. There are new controversies surrounding both the Democrat and Republican camps. For instance, there has been a lot of talk all over the news and media reporting that the Republican National Committee spent about $150,000 on new clothes for Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin. This story has not only attracted the attention of many Americans, but has stirred a flood of negative publicity. Although both Palin and Democratic Presidential Candidate Barack Obama have spent a large amount on clothing alone, some people have been quick to target the Alaska Governor. However, we are living in a society where looks, more than anything else, are what we base our judgment of people on. If you have one candidate who is dressed in designer clothing, and somebody else dresses in attire distinctly from a clearance rack, the latter will not be taken seriously. They spent a lot less on Sarah’s wardrobe than Obama spends on TV commercials. And look at the attention Sarah Palin is getting with her wardrobe. It doesn’t seem like such a bad political move. Anyway, America should not make a decision on who to vote for based on clothing, especially since the future of our country is at stake. With this in mind, vote for the candidate that supports our freedom for human rights and personal financial responsibility, such as the continued rights to no fax payday loans.

Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.