The conservative argument FOR Obama.

In 1964, at the age of 16, I organized the Dallas County Youth for Goldwater. My senior thesis at the University of Texas was on the conservative intellectual revival in America. Twenty years later, I was invited by William F. Buckley Jr. to join the board of National Review. I later became its publisher [...]

[T]oday it is so-called conservatives who are cemented to political programs when they clearly don’t work. The Bush tax cuts—a solution for which there was no real problem and which he refused to end even when the nation went to war—led to huge deficit spending and a $3 trillion growth in the federal debt. Facing this, John McCain pumps his “conservative” credentials by proposing even bigger tax cuts. Meanwhile, a movement that once fought for limited government has presided over the greatest growth of government in our history. That is not conservatism; it is profligacy using conservatism as a mask.

Today it is conservatives, not liberals, who talk with alarming bellicosity about making the world “safe for democracy.” It is John McCain who says America’s job is to “defeat evil,” a theological expansion of the nation’s mission that would make George Washington cough out his wooden teeth.

This kind of conservatism, which is not conservative at all, has produced financial mismanagement, the waste of human lives, the loss of moral authority, and the wreckage of our economy that McCain now threatens to make worse.

I now see that Obama is almost the ideal candidate for this moment in American history. I disagree with him on many issues. But those don’t matter as much as what Obama offers, which is a deeply conservative view of the world. Nobody can read Obama’s books (which, it is worth noting, he wrote himself) or listen to him speak without realizing that this is a thoughtful, pragmatic, and prudent man. It gives me comfort just to think that after eight years of George W. Bush we will have a president who has actually read the Federalist Papers.

Most important, Obama will be a realist. I doubt he will taunt Russia, as McCain has, at the very moment when our national interest requires it as an ally. The crucial distinction in my mind is that, unlike John McCain, I am convinced he will not impulsively take us into another war unless American national interests are directly threatened.

“Every great cause,” Eric Hoffer wrote, “begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.” As a cause, conservatism may be dead. But as a stance, as a way of making judgments in a complex and difficult world, I believe it is very much alive in the instincts and predispositions of a liberal named Barack Obama.

--Wick Allison

Former National Review publisher endorses Obama
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/17/122651/224/442/601632

No votes yet

...unless the party wants to take the blame for the coming debacle. It would be like the democratic opponent of Herbert Hoover winning the presidency in 1928. I hope McCain wins so that the immediate future can play out. 2012 is soon enough for a Democratic President to be elected to clean up the coming mess Bush and Cheney have allowed to occur. Until the country is ready nothing can be done about the economy. We just have to keep spiraling down into a "free enterprise" black hole.

Old South End Broadway

after two long years. Tick tick tick tick

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

'I used to have compassion, but they taxed it and legislated it out of existence.'

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

'I used to have compassion, but they taxed it and legislated it out of existence.'

What does it matter the label we apply?

The deregulation of the financial markets and the efforts to tinker with the housing markets before the deregulation lead us to the current mess we have now.

The fed's are releasing more money, as in auctioning off debt to stablize the world market, the world market.

" Sept. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve almost quadrupled the amount of dollars central banks can auction around the world to $247 billion in a coordinated bid to ease the worst crisis facing financial markets since the 1920s.

The Fed increased the amount of dollars that the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and other counterparts can offer from $67 billion ``to address the continued elevated pressures in U.S. dollar short-term funding markets.'' The Bank of England, the Bank of Canada and the Swiss National Bank also participated. "

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=abyFUcrzapb4&refer=home

The hands off approach has failed and now we pay the tab for the experiment and our children and their children, will be paying the tab.

It's not a political ideology at fault, it is people and greed that are at fault.

Reading up on Goldwater and the followers in the political arena, what is striking is that adherents that make it to office don't follow through on the dream, smaller less intrusive government.

Reagan, for instance, a champion to some of smaller and less government, increased the size of government.

Both parties clamor for less of this and less of that and yet when in office the opposite happens.

Hanging onto a dream that never seems to become reality.

The year, 1964, what has changed in 2008?

"But I have an uncomfortable feeling that this prosperity isn't something upon which we can base our hopes for the future. No nation in history has ever survived a tax burden that reached a third of its national income. Today thirty-seven cents out of every dollar earned in this country is the tax collector's share, and yet our government continues to spend 17 million dollars a day more than the government takes in. We haven't balanced our budget twenty-eight out of the last thirty-four years. We have raised our debt limit three times in the last twelve months, and now our national debt is one and a half times bigger than all the combined debts of all the nations of the world. We have 15 billion dollars in gold in our treasury - we don't own an ounce. Foreign dollar claims are 27.3 billion dollars, and we have just had announced that the dollar of 1939 will now purchase forty-five cents in its total value."

http://www.ronaldreagan.com/sp_23.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.